Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuickMedical
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:57, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- QuickMedical (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable company. No significant coverage in reliable sources (just some press releases and a few quotes from the CEO). Fails WP:COMPANY OCNative (talk) 05:13, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unless there is even one secondary source, there is no reason why this is should here.Curb Chain (talk) 05:29, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete gnews reveals press releases or comments by its CEO. No independent indepth coverage. LibStar (talk) 12:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nothing independent found in thorough search. Interstellarsheep (talk) 13:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep CEO and partner are creators of first American digital stadiometer. This device is used in many notable studies. PNW news source DrDK1967 (talk) 10:55, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Those would be reasons to keep an article on the CEO or on the product, not the company. Sergeant Cribb (talk) 10:05, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:41, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliable sources. And secondly, it tastes spammy... Island Monkey talk the talk 14:23, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.