User talk:Nyttend: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 04:36, 5 November 2024

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you.

Deleted Article Retrieval

Hi Nyttend,

You deleted my article: 23:13, 31 May 2024 Nyttend talk contribs deleted page Draft:Anne H. Flitcraft (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) (thank) that I need for a class assignment and I was wondering if it was any way possible to get that article back? Or if you could possibly put it back into draft space so that I can edit it? Please let me know, thanks.

My Hero

Nyttend,

All of your contributions to the various pages on the Bloomington, IN historic districts are so greatly appreciated. You're my hero. Thank you for your devotion of the preservation of memory of domestic architecture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felychko1991 (talk • contribs) 06:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jose Landi

Can you please userfy this page for me. 11:15, 13 April 2015 Nyttend talk contribs undeleted page Jose Landi (242 revisions restored: History merge) (thank)

Thank you BlackAmerican (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Template:NoCommons" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Template:NoCommons has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 11 § Template:NoCommons until a consensus is reached. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jarvisburg, North Carolina

I can't figure out how to link to deletion logs, but was going to #R this to Currituck County, North Carolina#Communities, but saw you G3'd in 2012 as a hoax. Guessing a redirect here is appropriate? fiveby(zero) 16:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fine. The deleted version is just a combination of copyvio and stupidity. Courcelles (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not fine, actually, for a few reasons that I mentioned at Fiveby's talk. Nyttend (talk) 22:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha, i was just being lazy with the redirect, stubbed. thanks. But now need to find out if it was named for this guy or not and if he needs an article to actually say something about the place. fiveby(zero) 00:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Dillaby" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Dillaby has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16 § Dillaby until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 21:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Do you happen to still have access or know of a way to get access to the May 5, 2011 Liberian Heritage? It's cited in Edward Kesselly, and I'd like to cite it in Quardu Gboni District as well, but I'm having no luck searching for it online. Not sure the best way to get a hold of it. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 02:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to you!

Hi, Nyttend,

It seems like years since I've run into you on the project but I just saw a comment you made on an AFD. I can see that you returned several months ago so here's a belated Welcome Back! I always valued your contributions and hope to see more of you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Classification Yards Specail Locos.

classification Yards section about Specail Locos was in English. Specail Locos means that they are specially designed for hump yards. I Like The british Rail Class 483 (talk) 11:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Horse Creek, Wyoming for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horse Creek, Wyoming is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horse Creek, Wyoming until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 01:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:Draughts" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Wikipedia:Draughts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30 § Wikipedia:Draughts until a consensus is reached. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 01:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chaceley

I created that article a few years back just like you created Chaseley, North Dakota back in 2008. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pennsylvania municipality pix list

I see you haven't updated your User:Nyttend/Pennsylvania list in a while. Late in the summer, I went through pretty much the whole list of 2500+ municipalities checking off if there was a Commons category, any photos, and a locator map. By checking against geo-located photos on Open Street Map and other photos since added, I basically have the updated list of municipalities like you had, good news we're down to about 157 municipalities without good or any images for their infobox. Because your list is so comprehensive and well put-together, is it alright with you if I go ahead and update your page/images? —Mr. Matté (^Talk/_Contrib) 22:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for File:The sun1.jpg

An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:The sun1.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 16:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whitescarver Hall

Hello, I left a comment on your Wikimedia Commons profile but I see you're more active here. You uploaded this photo: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Whitescarver_Hall.jpg from the Historic American Buildings Survey. This picture was taken by my late father. I didn't know he had contributed photos to HABS. Can you please tell me how you found it? Perodicticus (talk) 21:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I found it while going through the HABS digital archives on the Library of Congress website. Nyttend (talk) 07:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Marville (comics" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Marville (comics has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Marville (comics until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Kings (game" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Kings (game has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Kings (game until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Communities of Perry County, Tennessee template edits

Good afternoon! I see that you reverted an edit to this template to a version including a number of red links to pages that had been draftified until notability can be established. I am unsure of what you mean by your edit summary of "Redirecting communities to the county is grossly inappropriate," as it appears as though all you did was restore a number of red links. Could you please further explain what you were trying to do? Thanks! nf utvol (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They might not be notable, though. I added these places after I found them in the GNIS, but before I discovered the rule that simply existing in GNIS isn't enough for geographic places. Based on that, I took the articles that I created that I was having trouble finding additional sources or evidence of notability of, draftified then until I could do more research, and removed the entries I had created from the template. I didn't just go deleting redlinks, I deleted redlinks that I had added myself on a mistaken interpretation of the rules, then corrected when I realized my error. Either way, I'm still not sure what you were talking about with the redirecting comment, as none were redirects to the county.nf utvol (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nyttend, please correct this error

Nyttend, You created an entry for the historic home in Henrico named Edge Hill - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edge_Hill_(Richmond,_Virginia). You describe the accompanying photo as Front of Edge Hill but the street side view is the back. The south-facing front is magnificent and cannot be seen from Greenview Drive. This error would not matter but that the front of the house is significant to it's historic designation, please correct the text for your photo. Kwhopson (talk) 11:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Partial blocks

Per your question at ANI, I'll try to answer.

You can block editors from specific pages, in whatever namespace, or from entire namespaces. This is often useful in stopping edit warriors, as it's less drastic than a siteblock, and allows them to make their case on the article talkpage, for instance. You can block from multiple pages in different namespaces.

Namespace blocks can be useful for dealing with an editor who is to focused on WP space pot-stirring. . . Someone who is less than competent with templates might need a template space block. I've also used it for editors who are polite and communicative, but who have chronic sourcing issues in article space.

It can be extremely useful where you might otherwise have to place an overly large IP rangeblock - you can deal with a focused problem IP range by blocking the individual articles or editors they've focused on. Harassment IPs are often dealt with that way.

I wasn't keen on it at first, and there are still many times when someone just needs a siteblock. But it's a little gentler than a siteblock for editors whose problems can be isolated to a few locations, or where you want to preserve access to most of the 'pedia from a big range..

See WP:PBLOCK. Acroterion (talk) 21:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Art jewelry

Hi, just checking why you reverted my edit? Equine-man (talk) 20:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Belated Welcome back!

Hello, Nyttend,

I just saw your message an AN and I must say that I noticed your absence over the years but I hadn't noticed that you had returned and got your mop back. You were missed! We are short-handed in several admin areas on the project so, however you wish to contribute, your presence is very welcome. I myself took two years off, from 2016-2018 while I dealt with issues in my off-line life and I was glad I took a break. I hope you still find the work here satisfying. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask one of the old-timers. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see I already posted a belated welcome back in 2023, so just consider this a reprise! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CSD removals

Hi, I'm not sure why you have removed the CSD tags from these articles. They're quite clearly hoaxes which means G3 is applicable. Here's a search result for one of the them AusLondonder (talk) 23:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MRO

Hello Nyttend, could you please explain to me why you arbitrarily deleted Middlesex Record Office from the disambiguation page? In my opinion, the encyclopedic relevance is clearly given due to the presence of the article about the successor organization. Max12Max (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of CSD

Hi Nyttend,

I had requested a deletion of redirect Pain into Power to make way for AFC move of the draft article Draft:Pain into Power. The article cannot be reviewed or approved without actually deleting the redirect page. Can you kindly delete it? Cheers. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see MOS:GEOLINK

Hi Nyttend, I just made an edit to bring the Neal, Kansas, article in line with MOS:GEOLINK:

N Greenwood County, Kansas, United States ([[Greenwood County, Kansas|Greenwood County]], [[Kansas]], [[United States]])

Y Greenwood County, Kansas, United States ([[Greenwood County, Kansas]], United States)

I happened to take a look at the history of the article and noticed that you have been recently working on this and some related articles. It would be great if you could also help to fix some of the overlinking in these articles, in line with MOS:GEOLINK. Thanks! —Bkell (talk) 18:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robinson Township, Pennsylvania

The article Robinson Township, Pennsylvania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not required due to WP:TWODABS. Articles now appear separately at Robinson, and both link to each other.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Voice of Clam (talk) 07:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Cunty" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Cunty has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24 § Cunty until a consensus is reached. SmokeSomeDrinkSomePopOne (talk) 15:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

First Denbigh Parish Church Archeological Site Picture - precision location?

Hi Nyttend! You have an original picture attached to the First Denbigh Parish Church Archeological Site article here . In the description, you have it located 'off Miller Road' at 37° 06′ 14″ N, 76° 33′ 07″ W. Based on the NRHP nomination documentation, https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/VLR_to_transfer/PDFNoms/121-0037_First_Denbigh_Church_AE_Site_1982_Final_Nomination.pdf, the location was cited as being nearest 18 Walters Road, about 4500ft south, at the next creek convergence. Language in the NRHP doc described 15 feet out of 50 of the church having being lost to erosion before rip rap was added, implying it was right on the river. The Newport News property records at https://assessment.nnva.gov/PT/datalets/datalet.aspx?mode=sales&UseSearch=no&pin=178000121&jur=700&taxyr=2025&LMparent=20 also match the NRHP assertion of a Donald Shenk owning the land at the time of the 1981/2 submission. Before I update, do you happen to have a different source or personal knowledge that would put the location that 0.85 miles north, near Miller Road? Jacobsatterfield (talk) 18:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your message, no rush, thank you - I'll try to remember to circle back in a few months.

Jacobsatterfield (talk) 12:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message from LR.127

Hello, Nyttend. You have new messages at LR.127's talk page.
Message added 12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

LR.127 (talk) 12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hurricane Kristy (2024)

I saw that two days ago you had overruled my decline of Hurricane Kristy (2024) and moved it into mainspace anyway. There was an active discussion as to whether Category 5 hurricanes warrant notability, and the article will now most likely be merged. Why did you move it? Sir MemeGod  17:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you said you were curious about CTOP

Since you mentioned that you weren't familiar with the CTOP protection enforcements and were curious - if enforcing a protection of a page as part of WP:CTOP - there's a logging procedure outlined at Wikipedia:Contentious_topics#Logging to log said protection at the relevant subsection in the log, such as Wikipedia:Arbitration_enforcement_log#American_politics_(CT/AP) for enforcing an AMPOL protection so a history of such protections is centralized, for example to say be able to see how often a certain arbitration enforcement had to be enacted each year. As I'm editing fairly frequently on various CTOP articles and counter vandalism patrol, I've encountered my fair share of it, so I've become fairly familiar with the theoretical aspect of it to seek help from admins on it to help enforcement as necessary :) It's up to the admins discretion, but given the vandalism appeared clearly politically motivated, I would have considered it to fall under the AMPOL CTOP, which is why I suggested logging it, but it's up to you as the admin that imposed it of course :) Raladic (talk) 04:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]