User talk:Lourdes: Difference between revisions
→truncated?: new section |
→truncated?: re |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
Hey. I think part of your subthread got cut off. Best.[[User:Deepfriedokra|-- Deepfriedokra]] ([[User talk:Deepfriedokra|talk]]) 10:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC) |
Hey. I think part of your subthread got cut off. Best.[[User:Deepfriedokra|-- Deepfriedokra]] ([[User talk:Deepfriedokra|talk]]) 10:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
:Oh. Sorry. I think it reads okay now (right?). Thank you {{u|Deepfriedokra}}. Lourdes 04:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:34, 31 October 2023
You blocked them for sockpuppetry. Girth Summit found (as of 9/17) no evidence that they'd continued to do it, and I think we might consider an unblock. Take a look over there ... Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Daniel, I never blocked this editor. Girth has been the only one who did. Warmly, Lourdes 08:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- OK, sorry ... I think I was thinking of another editor you'd blocked. Sorry. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- No need to say sorry Daniel. It's good to get a message from you either way. Warmly, Lourdes 05:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- OK, sorry ... I think I was thinking of another editor you'd blocked. Sorry. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Rude comments at ANI
Please do not use that rude tone with me. I am innocent in all of this. I have done nothing wrong, in fact, I basically did nothing. I was largely inactive from Wikipedia from February 2023 up until now. Suddenly, I have been randomly attacked in the most egregious way possible. I have the right to be outraged, offended, and to feel violated by what has happened. I am incredibly angry at the events that have unfolded, and I request immediate administrator action to resolve the issue. Jargo Nautilus (talk) 09:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
My mental health is very bad currently, which has nothing to do with Wikipedia. I don't want to add another problem onto the pile. The user Grandmaster has launched a massive unprovoked assault against me, in a way that I was completely unprepared for. This horrendous attack must be punished severely. Jargo Nautilus (talk) 09:33, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
From my perspective, I have been minding my own business, when, BAM, out of nowhere, I have been attacked. How can you expect me to be patient or civil in a situation like this? I have the right to defend myself from this horrendous attack. Jargo Nautilus (talk) 09:35, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 October 2023
- News and notes: Where have all the administrators gone?
- In the media: Thirst traps, the fastest loading sites on the web, and the original collaborative writing
- Gallery: Before and After: Why you don't need to know how to restore images to make massive improvements
- Featured content: Yo, ho! Blow the man down!
- Traffic report: The calm and the storm
- News from Diff: Sawtpedia: Giving a Voice to Wikipedia Using QR Codes
A request for a bit of advice
Hello. We haven't interacted much (though I remember back in 2019 when you gave me NPR, which led me to actually getting semi-involved there), but I'd like to ask for just some quick advice, if you have the time. I've requested EFH a number of times, albeit a few years ago, when I was younger and dumber than I am now. I'd therefore just like to ask you whether it would be a good idea to try again. I had generally resolved not to leap into requesting the permission before (given that, admittedly, my previous requests had pretty much been rushed messes that gave off the impression I was just trying to hat collect), but I've started running into private filters a lot more in my work on WP:EFFPR. I've rambled on a lot, but my main question is whether you would say it's a good idea for me to request again, or if you perhaps have some tips. EggRoll97 (talk) 06:46, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hey EggRoll, good to see you here. Give me some time to ponder on this. Best, Lourdes Lourdes
- Thanks. I'll add that one of the reasons I ended up thinking about requesting again is that this went unanswered and even got moved to the rolling archive without anyone reviewing, while I worked on a report that came in later but couldn't review that one. EggRoll97 (talk) 04:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 12:49, 29 October 2023 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 12:49, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Hey. I think part of your subthread got cut off. Best.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oh. Sorry. I think it reads okay now (right?). Thank you Deepfriedokra. Lourdes 04:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)