User talk:Biruitorul

/Archive1 /Archive2 /Archive3

Treceţi batalioane române, Carpaţii speedy

Hi. You recently tagged Treceţi batalioane române, Carpaţii for speedy deletion under CSD A7. However, A7 only applies to people, organizations, and web content. The article in question is a song, so I have removed the tag. Please keep this in mind in the future. Cheers! --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 03:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Nikola Petkov

Greetings! The early postwar period is not among my favourite (I don't like the abolishment of monarchy and think that we should have kept at least Western Thrace in the treaty of Paris ;-) but I will expand the article for Petkov from the BG Wikipedia these days (most of my history books are not at home...) Best, --Gligan (talk) 20:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I am also grateful for your contributions to the article of Nikola Petkov. Your only slight mistake is that Dr G. M. Dimitrov (known also as Geme Dimitrov) was a democrat although ironically both his first and family names coincide with the name of the communist leader;-) Perhaps I should make a small article for him as well. And of course I disagree for Southern Dobrudzha - it was a purely and solely Bulgarian territory and its occupation by Romania is considered a mistake even by most Romanians I know:-) I think that Hungary, Poland and Czechoslovakia were also doomed - at least because of the presence of Soviet troops... Regards, --Gligan (talk) 19:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, it is indeed an interesting matter to discuss. I think that that the Americans did not want to create tensions with the Soviets or had some sort of agreement for Prague. Austria was not so important for USSR to separate its occupation zone as it did with Germany - it would have been only unnecessary trouble and tension in my opinion to divide the country or to impose a communist government.

As far as support is concerned I think you are right - many people in the late 40s and early 50s really believed in the ideals of communism; they were convinced that they were working for the prosperity of the nation and equality of all people (for instance my grand-father's brother always describes to me the building of the Batak Hydro Cascade in the 50s with great enthusiasm) and when they realized what the reality was - it was too late... --Gligan (talk) 19:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for the intrusion, but I think I can add to the conversation. As far as I remember Bulgaria wasn't that doomed. It was on the verge, I think, on the famous box of matches. The percentage was something like 60-40 to Stalin, but I might be wrong. We could've escaped alongside Greece, but I guess the Soviets had a too tight grip here. I've studied some Romanian history in my first semester, but I forgot - were or were not the communists supported in Romania? I think that they weren't and that Russians were generally not too popular in the country, so this would've been a great chance if you weren't surrounded by us commies :)) --Laveol ^T 20:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

DYK triple

On 13 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with facts from the articles Hungarian parliamentary election, 1945, Hungarian parliamentary election, 1947, and Hungarian parliamentary election, 1949, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Threeper! Nice job. --Gatoclass (talk) 20:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

6/14 DYK

On 14 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gheorghe Ştefănescu, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford ^Pray 02:51, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Şelimbăr

I noticed that you've remerged my pages with the villages in Şelimbăr. A thing that I strongly oppose but feel it's not worth my time arguing about. But since you've done that I invite you to be consistent and merge all villages in Romania and elsewhere. You may start here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_villages_in_Cluj Andreic777 (talk) 10:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi, friend. Your words touched me, and I thank you from the bottom of my heart.

Alas, I tuned in too late for my vote on that soap bubble issue to count - you made a very good point, to which I would have added a request for those who endorse the move to find a context where the name has no diacritics but other words do.

Alas, I'm putting on hold all the other common projects for a while, but I urge you to edit any and all of my sandboxes at your convenience. Dahn (talk) 22:39, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On 19 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article British West Indian labour unrest of 1934—1939, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 10:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Unblock

That block was accidental, it was my fault and I apologize. The autoblock should be fixed now. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:31, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Someone pointed out that Digwuren specifies up to a month, so I changed his block to a month. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Romanian Dioceses

You want to tackle them? They are the last that need to be done in Europe. :D Benkenobi18 (talk) 21:48, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

That would be awesome :) Be nice to get all of Europe done. North America is finished, Oceania is finished, South America is finished. Now Europe! Benkenobi18 (talk) 01:16, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

John Paul, Sr.

Hiya. I originally intended to say he was from "Holland, The Netherlands" in the opening, but Wikipedia doesn't accept Holland, The Netherlands as valid. So I'm unsure of the correct wording. Is there a correct way to indicated the region and the Nation? (If Holland, The Netherlands is correct, it could just be manually done) CitiCat ^♫ 21:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Re:Vin americanii!

I have heard about a similar hope in Poland, for the Third World War to liberate Poland. Here are some English refs: [1], [2], [3] (this one also mention similar attitude among Ukrainians). Congratulations on another interesting article! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 23:20, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked as a sockpuppet of Bonaparte. :-D But seriously, do you want me to mention to him that you are a well-established user with 36,000 edits - who has been here since May 2006? Or do you want me to tell him he is 100% wrong that you follow the "same pattern" as Bonny. Please let me know if you would would prefer it if I assure him on his talk page or whether you would be willing to have yourself checked. Khoikhoi 01:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Hahaha, I knew it would work. I will leave a note on his talk page. Khoikhoi 02:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cold War

You may find it interesting.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Just wanted to say Thank You for all the things you are putting into the Cold War article, especially the analysis part, because that seems to be lacking in the article. Also, since one of my big concerns with the article is its size, do you see anything that you believe could be cut? Hires an editor (talk) 20:39, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

1971 Turkish coup d'état

On 28 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1971 Turkish coup d'état, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 20:09, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Assumptions of good faith..

I am not making speculations that Romanian nationalist know that Roma are only a subgroup. Look at what the user Rezistenta said here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Roma_people#.22Roma.2FRomani_people.22_vs_.22Gypsies.22

"Roma cannot be preffered over gypsy for the very simple reason that Roma is a sub-group of the gypsies, this means not all gypsies are Roma". So he knows that not all "gypsies" are Roma.

You have received "The All Seeing Eye" for "maintaining neutrality". I hope you will continue to do so. Best regards. AKoan (talk) 07:15, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Cold War

I am not at all happy with Miyokan's edits, but I have had some sort of conflict with him (see e.g. this petty drama and this one), so I wouldn't like to revert him. However, I believe that tertiary sources like Britannica are unacceptable, especilly as there are plenty of scholarship published on this topic. Keep an eye on this. Colchicum (talk) 08:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Vin americanii!

Excellent work on the article. Thanks for adding additional sources. I went ahead and gave it a thumbs up.Nrswanson (talk) 19:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't think a one source tag is necessary anymore. You addressed the major issue which was the fact that the two main sections of the article only cited one source. Now they have two sources so no problems from my point of view. Good work. Your article is slated to appear in the next update.Nrswanson (talk) 21:18, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

CFR

Da, ştiu foarte bine că CFR este "Compania de Căi Ferate Române", deoarece eu am lucrat 2 ani în cadrul ei, şi am călătorit în toata România cu trenul şi te rog să mă crezi că am trecut prin 90% din gări. Nu voi mai trece. Razvanus. Am de gând să fac articole despre mai multe gări din România, deoarece cred că deţin (am acces) la momentul actual la foarte multe informaţii. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Razvanus (talk • contribs) 20:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

7/1 DYK

On 1 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vin americanii!, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford ^Pray 02:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:RM on People's Militia

Saw you had listed these - two pages. Might you consider making a link at the Leningrad (whatever) Army page to the main name page, so we can centralise the discussion there, which will then impact the main N.O./PM, the Leningrad NO/PM Army, and the Soviet divisions page? Kind regards Buckshot06(prof) 05:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Cold War

Hi Biruitorul, I noticed that you were involved in its FAC in the past days. As i'm away on holiday since Friday and unable to contribute (although I might pop-in just like now), would you (if/where possible) take care of any issues within the FAC? Thanks and all the best. --Eurocopter (talk) 13:33, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

West Parish Elementary School

This article has been PRODded before (once by me), and the PROD subsequently removed. I'm taking this to AfD now since that seems to be the only way to go. Feel free to chime in. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:17, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Template:EgyptPMs

Hi, Biruitorul! I just saw that you created a template for Egyptian Prime ministers. Great job! I was going to do it myself, but now that you've done it, I'll just have to work on improving it rather than working on it from scratch. Regards. BomBom (talk) 21:15, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Robert Preus

Please take a look at the references I added to Robert Preus. I think they are enough to show notability. You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Preus. --Eastmain (talk) 23:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Amory Lovins

Hi. Would you care to makes some changes to this article to improve tone? Johnfos (talk) 00:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Pre-review request

The article has MOS issues. For instance:

• Dashes. Year ranges like "1348-1471" need to use en dashes per WP:DASH.
• Is there really only one reference for the entire article? The lead should also have references.

Gary King (talk) 20:58, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

List of victims of the Babi Yar massacre

I corrected the typo you noticed here. I'll note that the list does not include any victims of the Babi Yar massacre. Jd2718 (talk) 05:10, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Moldovans

I hope you do realize that by participating in the derailing of the discussion, whether by responding to provocation, or posting it yourself doesn't help any? I am rather interested in seeing your opinion and suggestions on those specific edits by Olahus, rather than yet another round of pointless bickering with Xasha. --Illythr (talk) 08:48, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Good to be back

Hi, thanks for the warm greeting. As I told Eurocopter last week I will be able to edit only sporadically... however I'll be glad to help whenever you guys need me. Anyway, thank you for keeping the Romanian Wiki community together, from what I've seen so far you are a real information broker in the Romanian informal network on the English Wikipedia. It's good that there's someone like you to coordinate things a bit in the face of so many self-inflated egos and traditional disunity that plague the virtual or real-life Romanian communities. Keep up the good work, Mentatus (talk) 06:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Good - this is a good project for me to work on because I do not have enough time for lengthy and elaborate edits. As you might already know, I completed all the communes in the Constanţa County (a year ago or so). I do agree with you that adding articles for each and every tiny and God-forsaken village doesn't really make any sense (that's what I did so far, I added only the communes, not the component villages) since the articles won't store any other information beside the name and the commune they belong to, unless there's something relevant about the village itself to write about (e.g. an important historical event took place there and so on - which I guess it's gonna be pretty rare to start with).

Regarding the "Moldova conflict": Yes, it's silly and sad at the same time. I saw the "Moldovenist" cause just gained some new zealous proselytes ready to conduct edit-wars of attrition. I tend to stay out of this for the moment because of the time constraints - if you guys keep an eye on it I'm sure it won't get out of hand.

If there's anything else I can do give me a shout. Cheers, Mentatus (talk) 07:24, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:Ataman Tiutiunik

Would this be the newly created Yurii Tiutiunnyk‎? Our article is still being developed, it says he was shot in October 1930, Encyclopedia of Ukraine article says 1929, I just noticed that discrepancy. Hope that helps, I will work with user:Horlo (the creator) to expand. Ostap 00:10, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

July 10 DYK

On 10 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of Dukes and Grand Dukes of Mecklenburg, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford ^Pray 05:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Humour is a good thing, really

It took me a while to stop laughing. Petlura was not killed by the Soviets. Sholom Schwartzbard was the hero who have done it. Media Sapiens (talk) 16:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry. it's called a conspiracy teory and it cant be taken seriously. "May" is a word of imagination. In real life, no-one ever found any prove the Soviets gave him the orders or where involved in any way. Scwartzbard did that heroic deed because 15 of his family members died in pogroms. Thats the whole case. He was of many who wanted to do it, he was of many who had a reason to do it, the huge number of streets after him in Israel proves it. The Soviets being involved? Conspiracy theories. I never liked those games. You can claim ny the same arguments Petlure was taken by a UFO. Media Sapiens (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Have you heard the pgrase "historical speculation"? It's when a historian wants to eat and writed a book which will cause noise. There is such a possibility, but it has the same number of real proves, i underline, not ideas and possibilities, but real stone-made proves, that Petlura was taken by a UFA, or that he is actualy still alive and lives on a beach in Miamy. Media Sapiens (talk) 16:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

And the most likely is the version the the real historians agreed with, it was a revenge by someone who lost 15 family members in the pogroms. When someone's 15 members are killed, he doesn't ned the NKVD, the CIA, the MOSSAD or whatever to thent them. There's a reason he's a hero in Israel. Media Sapiens (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

I saw on a TV program a version that Petlura was killed by one of his men over some fortune he stole. It's a logical version. He controled so many territories, murdered so many people, logical that he also took what they have. Logical someone might want it to. But do you see me talking as if it's the truth? No, Why? It's nothing nore then a version. Just like what you suggest. Media Sapiens (talk) 17:51, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

For your information, you are arguing with banned user MVEi, a self described National Bolshevik who once claimed the people of Lviv were Hungarians, and made this comment which needs no explanation. His last sockpuppet was banned last week... Ostap 22:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

You can read more of his offensive comments here: [4]. Ostap 22:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Uhhh...

Mikka posted around a few alerts about some kind of dispute going on at Talk:Michael_I_of_Romania. As I recall, your opinion on Michael is pretty high, so, perhaps you might be interested in taking a look over there? --Illythr (talk) 00:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Aah, the suspense! --Illythr (talk) 13:47, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Cokie's picture

File:Cokie Roberts-a.jpg

Hello Biruitorul, I am glad you uploaded Cokie Roberts's picture, I thought of doing the same thing yesterday when i uploaded her signature, becuase, just as you noticed, it is in the National Archives website, and in some other government websites, however, i did not upload the image because according to the website's privacy policy[5],

"not all materials appearing on this web site are in the public domain. Some materials have been donated or obtained from individuals or organizations and may be subject to restrictions on use".

However it also says,

"Images on our web site which are in the public domain may be used without permission." but if the image is indeed in the public domain for previous reason, then it should be uploaded with another licence.

Now if you did gave some thought to this predicament, and did see a way out of that copyright infringment, then its cool, I wont call for the image to be taken off! but i would like to know your reasoning behind it so i can myself upload pics in the future and have a valid reason to back it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mijotoba (talk • contribs) 00:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Ups i just realized that i didnt sing the last comment, anyways, like i said, i will not say anything, i have wondered before about asking the flickr people for permission, but thats just a hassle, if in the event that someone does take your picture up, i will make some attempt to contact those greedy copyright waving users to share a pic. mijotoba (talk) 02:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On 12 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hungarian Round Table Talks, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Rudget (logs) 09:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

On 12 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Constitution of Hungary, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 10:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Erastus Brainerd

Man, where do you find these sources? The Report of the Class Secretary of the Class of 1874 of Harvard College?? And I even lived four years of my life in Middletown, Connecticut, so it would have leapt out at me if I found anything more detailed about his birthplace. - Jmabel | Talk 16:16, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Félix Houphouët-Boigny

I recently noticed that Félix Houphouët-Boigny was being translated, but it seems like this process has been at a standstill for more than two months now. I recall your previous interest in translating the fr.wiki article, so I was wondering if you could look into that in the near future. Despite my unfamiliarity with the French language, I'd be glad to lend a hand by using a rough babelfish translation. Thanks, Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Editorofthewiki said it's okay if we take over the translating process. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 23:15, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I'll help again, now that there is renewed interest in the topic. Once this is complete, it will be one of Wikipedia's longest FA's, with over 90kb in the French version! Good luck collaborating with you! --I'm an Editorofthewiki^{[citation needed]} 04:10, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

I've just got so many things going on in the wikiworld, I didn't have enough time to focus on this. User:Skyplane also volunteered to help, although they haven't made an edit in over two months. William Tubman and Leon Mba also need doing. But when we're done with this, we'll just tap ourselves on the back and remember we did something epic. --I'm an Editorofthewiki^{[citation needed]} 05:32, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Agree

I have to agree with Erdeniss. Let the picture with the orthodox church as well as data from 2008. See you, Pilsner Desk (talk) 17:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed move of Julian the Apostate (again)

I am contacting you because you participated in a recent discussion at Talk:Julian the Apostate about changing the title of the page. That discussion closed, and immediately afterwards a new proposal was created to move the page to Julian. Please give your opinion of this new proposal at Talk:Julian the Apostate#Requested_move_2. --Akhilleus (talk) 19:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello there

I usually don't send links but here goes :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANTDkfkoBaI Cheers. Hobartimus (talk) 07:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

RfA thank you

		Thank you!
		Biruitorul, it is with deep awareness of the responsibility conferred by your trust that I am honored to report that in part to your support, my request for adminship passed (87/14/6). I deeply value the trust you and the Wikipedia community have in me, and I will embark on a new segment of my Wikipedia career by putting my new tools to work to benefit the entire community. My best to you, Happyme22 (talk) 04:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Whoa!

Hi, Biru. I'm back (more or less), and I want to begin by thanking you again for the moral support. I'm sad to say that the outcome was as predicted, although the final moment still managed to come unexpectedly (there was an abrupt decline, which, in retrospect and given the suffering he was exposed to and the horrific state of hospitals in Romania, was probably for the best). I'm slowly coming to terms with it.

But now for better and more unusual news. I was editing some more on the Bogdan-Piteşti and Mateiu articles, and was wondering if there are some more sources out there. A fine one came along (and from what an outstanding author!), but, it turns out, I would partly be citing... myself (eight paragraph from the top). I'm truly humbled, and this ranks as one of the best things happening to me since I started editing wikipedia. But this leaves open the issue of citing that article... Should I ignore that part and focus on the rest? Hm. Dahn (talk) 20:41, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Hm again. Unfortunately, Giurescu says virtually nothing (other than a couple of generic banalities) about the Moldavian Revolution. Djuvara also largely ignores it, and in any case I don't have the book on me; it's safe to just paste the Djuvara references from the MK article, as they are virtually all that he has to say (note that they are mostly about what happened afterwards). I could do that and also revisit other sources I used in the past if it's okay by you, but I'm afraid there is little of substance on the actual events, if that is what you were looking for. I'll see what I can do today or, at the latest, tomorrow. Don't worry, if all goes well, a DYK is in the making. (Can I please also change the link to Constantinople? I know it sounds better to Orthodox ears, and I respect that, but at least for now the article it leads to stops dead in the 15th century, and makes a point about stopping there.)

Don't it seem like we're the good cop (you)-bad cop (me) of rowiki? :) Indeed, I'm glad to see things moving there, and, though I take little interest in the Spice Girls myself, I have to say that the guys doing pop over there put the other camps (except Plinul's, of course) to shame for now (well, I did a little pop myself).

Awright, I'll take your advice on Vianu's article - just allow me to quote it if the usual crowd should get the idea that I'm "on my high horse etc" ;).

Finally, a geographical query: I'm contemplating expanding the Anatol Baconsky article, but his birthplace is a mystery. He was born in Cofa, Bessarabia, supposedly in Hotin County. Would that be a village or part of a larger locality? Does it still exist? Is it still named Cofa? Google gives me the most idiotic results, and I can't either limit the search or access a better source. Dahn (talk) 22:32, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Salut!

Hi, Biru, I'm Vijay. From what I've seen and heard, you seem to be a remarkably good editor. We seem to have been involved in a few discussions recently (especially because I'm familiar with at least two users you know), but we never actually said anything directly to each other. So I just thought I'd wiki-introduce myself :) --Kuaichik (talk) 03:15, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

"Criminally little"?! But I have 25 of his movies on DVD sitting there on a shelf, just a few feet away from where I'm sitting right now! And they all have subtitles in English! --Kuaichik (talk) 17:00, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, mine is nothing so fancy! It's just a cheap birthday gift my dad got me from some online Indian shop. (Of course, by "cheap," I mean in price, not in value!! :-D) --Kuaichik (talk) 19:11, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I know a Malayalam movie like that from the 1960s, black-and-white with only one scene in color. I've never seen it, but I've heard about it.

Anyway, in case you were wondering, that "online Indian shop" is bdbazar.com. (And what my dad bought is the "Satyajit Ray Box Set (30% Off)" :)). --Kuaichik (talk) 19:55, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Huh! I've never actually seen Ritwik Ghatak's movies before...

You know, some of these are available online, too. The entire Apu trilogy is available on Google Videos with subtitles (although I guess you have that). So is Akaler Shondhoney, another Bengali movie by Mrinal Sen. There are three other art movies in other Indian languages I know of, too. --Kuaichik (talk) 20:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Ohh! Îmi pare rǎu, dar nu sunt un expert de drepturi de autor. Um, I hope that makes sense. I had to look up "copyright" and make sure expert actually was a word in Romanian! But in case it still doesn't make sense: I'm not really much of an expert on copyrights and such. That's why I haven't even uploaded a single image on Wikipedia, ever! :-/ --Kuaichik (talk) 22:55, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Source

Hello. Thanks for fixing image source. Could you please put a link to the galley page, as per {{bsr}}? Thank you again!--OsamaK 19:29, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Excuse me, Stop removing tags with no reason, I spent long time while working.--OsamaK 19:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Did you read the tag? It doesn't say "This image is probably out of public domain".--OsamaK 19:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Please stop removing, it is not useful to talk while you removing! Source of these images is requested as well as modern ones, there is no different Wikipedia is not an original _{or first} source, and its policies say that clearly.--OsamaK 19:44, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:TABOO

Hi. Interested in your thoughts on this. Peter Damian (talk) 18:31, 22 July 2008 (UTC).

Image:Blanche-de-Castilla.jpg

Please, stop! This is a simple joke, this is not a photograph image, that's meaning, it may be drown recently.--OsamaK 18:50, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Yikes! I may not know much at all about images, etc., and maybe I'm just saying something stupid, but isn't this disclaimer(? for lack of a better word) a bit harsh? --Kuaichik (talk) 19:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

1970 floods in Romania DYK

On 22 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1970 floods in Romania, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! --PeterSymonds (talk) 19:42, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Please confine yourself to Eastern Europe in future

Talk:William_Lyon_Mackenzie_King#Gallery

Adam_sk (talk) 06:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC)