Talk:Worms: A Space Oddity: Difference between revisions
reviews section note |
m →Reviews Section: typo correct |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Reviews Section== |
==Reviews Section== |
||
I've removed the one line sentence that was under the "Reviews" section. It didn't make much sense grammatically |
I've removed the one line sentence that was under the "Reviews" section. It didn't make much sense grammatically and also didn't provide any (meaningful) new information. The "Reviews" template is enough for now, though if someone wants to summarize the review table in textual form that might be nice. What was there, however, was not worth keeping. See the page history. [[User:RShnike|RShnike]] ([[User talk:RShnike|talk]]) 23:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 23:59, 2 June 2008
The sources just aren't good enough. We need a source from THQ as well. So this is what YOU can do. Check THQ's website and find a source there. But until then, the unreferenced tag stays on, until a more reliable source is found. (Sneasel99 (talk) 20:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC))
The sources are good enough, i am removing the tag. If you have any concerns, send a message on my talk page. (Astrodog280 (talk) 18:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC))
Help bring an image!
Image now available. Check for it, and bring it to the article. (Donmardon (talk) 16:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC))
Reviews Section
I've removed the one line sentence that was under the "Reviews" section. It didn't make much sense grammatically and also didn't provide any (meaningful) new information. The "Reviews" template is enough for now, though if someone wants to summarize the review table in textual form that might be nice. What was there, however, was not worth keeping. See the page history. RShnike (talk) 23:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)