Talk:Loch Tay

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2a02:c7c:d094:5500:e4c8:a571:c735:d57d (talk) at 01:26, 8 June 2024 (Is it actually called Tay Tay though: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 5 months ago by 2A02:C7C:D094:5500:E4C8:A571:C735:D57D in topic Is it actually called Tay Tay though

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Loch Tay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Is it actually called Tay Tay though

So someone's recently gone through and changed mentions of the name to "Loch Tay Tay", and the citation is this event where they unveiled a sign. I can see that Loch Tay (Tay) Highland Lodge have renamed and that the sign exists, but I can't find any indication that a legally binding change has been made to the loch itself. I'd assume you'd need a public consultation to do that, and that the sign is more of a stunt by the Highland Lodge & Heart Radio. Would very much like to see something definitive either way. 2A01:4B00:D107:9400:9175:59F9:6888:B77 (talk) 13:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

No. It isn't. It's only something that radio station did as a publicity stunt. This is NOT the actual name of the loch and it should be changed back. 2A02:C7C:D094:5500:E4C8:A571:C735:D57D (talk) 01:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's impossible to prove a negative, but I would say that the lack of official sources, such as a comment from our tourism board or national government, should be taken as a sign that this is simply a stunt. 2A02:C7C:D094:5500:E4C8:A571:C735:D57D (talk) 01:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy