Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosome painting in the African four-striped mouse Rhabdomys pumilio: Detection of possible murid specific contiguous segment combinations

  • Published:
Chromosome Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization was used to construct a comparative chromosome map between the laboratory mouse, Mus musculus and the African four-striped mouse, Rhabdomys pumilio. A high degree of homology between the species was detected using both FISH and G-banding. Ten mouse chromosomes (2–4, 7, 14–16, 18, 19 and the X) were retained as chromosomal arms or intact chromosome blocks. Six mouse chromosome painting probes that correspond to mouse autosomes 5, 6, 8, 11, 12 and 13, produced double signals; the remaining four painting probes (1, 9, 10 and 17) hybridized to three or more R. pumilio chromosomes respectively. In total, the 20 mouse chromosome paints revealed 40 segments of conserved synteny in the R. pumilio genome. Most of the mouse chromosomes that produced single signals in R. pumilio have previously been shown to be conserved in the Black and Norwegian rats and the Chinese hamster. Eight contiguous segment associations appear to be R. pumilio specific, two were shared by R. pumilio and the Black and Norwegian rats, but to the exclusion of the Chinese hamster. Our data suggest that mouse chromosomes 1, 10, and 17 have undergone extensive rearrangements during genome evolution in the murids and may be useful markers for enhancing our understanding of the mode and tempo of chromosome evolution in rodents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Botting JH, Morrison AR (1997) Animal research is vital to medicine. Sci Am 276: 83-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavagna P, Stone G, Stanyon R (2002) Black rat (Rattus rattus) genomic variability characterized by chromosome painting. Mammal Genome 13: 157-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Gilbert DJ et al. (1993) A genetic linkage map of the mouse: current applications and future prospects. Science 262: 57-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davisson MT, Akeson EC (1987) An improved method for preparing G-banded chromosomes from mouse peripheral blood. Cytogenet Cell Genet 45: 70-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davisson MT, Bradt DW, Merriam JJ, Rockwood SF, Epping JT (1998) The mouse gene map. ILAR J 39: 96-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Graaff G (1981) The Rodents of Southern Africa. Durban: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducroz J-F, Granjon L, Lombard M, Volobouev V (1999) Comparative chromosome analysis (R-and C-bands) of two South African murid species, Lemniscomys rosalia and Rhabdomys pumilio (Rodentia, Murinae). Cytogenet Cell Genet 87: 69-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman, JR (1941) The Families and Genera of Living Rodents. London, UK: British Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill T, Smith G, Wissler R, Kunz H (1989) The rat as an experimental animal. Science 245: 269-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graphodatsky AS, Yang F, O'Brien PCM et al. (2001) Phylogenetic implications of the 38 putative ancestral chromosome segments for four canid species. Cytogenet Cell Genet 92: 243-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grutzner F, Himmelbauer H, Paulsen M, Ropers H-H, Haaf T (1999) Comparative mapping of mouse and rat chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genomics 55: 306-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilly M-N, Fouchet P, De Chamisso P, Schmitz A, Dutrillaux B (1999) Comparative karyotype of rat and mouse using bidirectional chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 7: 213-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helou K, Walentinsson A, Levan G, Stahl F (2001) Between rat and mouse zoo-FISH reveals 49 chromosome segments that have been conserved in evolution. Mammal Genome 12: 765-771.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISCN (1978) An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Report of the Standing Committee on Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Cytogenet Cell Genet 21: 309-404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs LL, Pilbeam D(1980) Of mice and men: fossil based divergence dates and molecular ‘clocks’. J Hum Evol 9: 551-555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop BF, Baker RJ, Haiduk MW, Engstrom MD (1984) Cladistic analysis of primitive G-band sequence for the karyotype of the ancestor of the Cricetidae complex of rodents. Genetica 64: 199-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons LA, Laughlin TF, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Womack JE, O'Brien SJ (1997) Comparative anchor tagged sequences (CATS) for integrative mapping of mammalian genome. Nature Genet 15: 47-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahida H, Campbell GK, Taylor PJ (1999) Genetic variation in Rhabdomys pumilio (Sparrman 1784)-an allozyme study. S Afr J Zool 34: 91-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller S, Stanyon R, O'Brien PC, Ferguson-Smith MA, Plesker R, Wienberg J (1999) Defining the ancestral karyotype of all primates by multidirectional chromosome painting between tree shrew, lemurs and humans. Chromosoma 108: 393-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy WJ, Stanyon R, O'Brien SJ (2001) Evolution of mammalian genome organization inferred from comparative gene mapping. Genome Biol 2: 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau JH, Taylor BA (1984) Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 814-818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie W, Wang J, O'Brien PCM et al. (2002) The genome phylogeny of domestic cat, red panda and five mustelid species revealed by comparative chromosome painting and G-banding. Chromosome Res 10: 209-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak RM (1999) Order Rodentia. In: Walker's Mammals of theWorld. Vol II, 6th Edition. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp 1243-1712.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien SJ, Stanyon R (1999) Ancestral primate viewed. Nature 402: 365-366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overbeek PA, Gorlov IP, Sutherland RW et al. (2001) A transgenic insertion causing cryptorchidism in mice. Genesis 30: 26-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambau RV, Robinson TJ (in press). Molecular genetics of Rhabdomys pumilio subspecies boundaries. mtDNA phylogeography and karyotypic analysis by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Mol Phylogenet. Evol.

  • Rens W, O'Brien PCM, Yang F et al. (2001) Karyotypic relationships between distantly related marsupials from South America and Australia. Chromosome Res 9: 301-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokas A & Holland PWH (2000) Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. Trends Ecol Evol 15: 454-459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts A (1951) The Mammals of South Africa. Johannesburg: The Mammals of South Africa Book Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalzi JM, Hozier JC (1998) Comparative genome mapping: mouse and rat homologies revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genomics 47: 44-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherthan H, Cremer T, Arnason U et al. (1994) Comparative chromosome painting discloses homologous segments in distantly related mammals. Nature Genet 6: 342-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabright M (1971) A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2: 971-972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner JD, Smithers HN (1990) The Mammals of the Southern African Subregion. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanyon R, Yang F, Cavagna P et al. (1999) Reciprocal chromosome painting shows that genomic rearrangement between rat and mouse proceeds ten times faster than between humans and cats. Cytogenet Cell Genet 84: 150-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75: 304-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szpirer C, Szpirer J, Klinga-Levan K, Stahl F, Levan G (1996) The rat: an experimental animal in search of a genetic map. Foloi Biol 42: 175-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, PJ (2000) Patterns of chromosomal variation in southern African rodents. J Mammal 81: 317-331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, O'Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith MA (2000) Comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster defined by reciprocal chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 8: 219-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, Alkalaeva EZ, Perelman PL et al. (in press) Reciprocal chromosome painting between Human, Aardvark and Elephant (Superorder Afrotheria) reveals the likely eutherian ancestral karyotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rambau, R.V., Robinson, T.J. Chromosome painting in the African four-striped mouse Rhabdomys pumilio: Detection of possible murid specific contiguous segment combinations. Chromosome Res 11, 91–98 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022887629707

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022887629707

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy