Skip to main content
Log in

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH CHEATING AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS: A Review

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A review was conducted of the results of 107studies of the prevalence and correlates of cheatingamong college students published between 1970 and 1996.The studies found cheating to be more common in the 1969-75 and 1986-96 time periods thanbetween 1976 and 1985. Among the strongest correlates ofcheating were having moderate expectations of success,having cheated in the past, studying under poor conditions, holding positive attitudes towardcheating, perceiving that social norms support cheating,and anticipating a large reward for success. However, animportant limitation on the conclusions drawn from this research is that many variables wereincluded in only one or a few studies. A model of theantecedents of cheating is proposed and the implicationsof this model for the identification of students at risk for cheating and controlling cheatingare discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

APPENDIX: STUDIES INCLUDED IN THE LITERATURE REVIEW

REFERENCES

  • Ahmed, S. M. S. (1979). Visibility of the victim. Journal of Social Psychology107(2): 253-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alschuler, A. S., and Blimling, G. S. (1995). Curbing epidemic cheating through systemic change. College Teaching43(4): 123-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asendorpf, J. B., and Nunner-Winkler, G. (1992). Children's moral motive strength and temperamental inhibition reduce their immoral behavior in real moral conflicts. Child Development63(5): 1223-1235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L., and Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality25(3): 285-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, W. W. (1961). Ethics, examinations, and education. School and Society89(December): 412-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, H. C. (1928). Mental test traits of college cribbers. School and Society27(June 23): 764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushway, A., and Nash, W. R. (1977). School cheating behavior. Review of Educational Research47(4): 623-632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, W. M., and Burton, R. V. (1982). Training children to be consistently honest through verbal self-instructions. Child Development53(4): 911-939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. (ed.) (1995). Four Committee Papers from the October 1994 Conference on Academic Integrity. Stanford, CA: Center for Academic Integrity, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collison, M. (1990, January 17). Apparent rise in students' cheating has college officials worried. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A33.

  • Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., and McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology19(1): 16-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Clark, R. E., Williams, L. E., Francis, B., and Haines, V. J. (1996). College cheating: Ten years later. Research in Higher Education37(4): 487-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R. (1992). Learned industriousness. Psychological Review99(4): 248-267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eison, J. A., Pollio, H. R., and Milton, O. (1986). Educational and personal characteristics of four different types of learning-and grade-oriented students. Contemporary Educational Psychology11(1): 54-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fass, R. A. (1990). Cheating and plagiarism. In W. M. May (ed.), Ethics and Higher Education(pp. 170-183). New York: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, J. R., Johnson, J. L., and McCown, W. G. (eds.) (1995). Procrastination and Task Avoidance: Theory, Research, and Treatment. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., and Rosenman, R. H. (1977). The key cause: Type A behavior pattern. In A. Monat and R. H. Lazrus (eds.), Stress and Coping(pp. 203-212). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1990). The Protestant Work Ethic: The Psychology of Work-Related Beliefs and Behaviours. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes54(1): 81-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronlund, N. E. (1993). How to Make Achievement Tests and Assessments, 5th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., and Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education25(4): 342-354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., Biggs, J., and Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research66(2): 99-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V. (1994). Fixed effect models. In H. Cooper and L. V. Hedges (eds.), Handbook of Research Synthesis(pp. 285-299). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houser, B. B. (1982). Student cheating and attitude: A function of classroom control technique. Contemporary Educational Psychology7(2): 113-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J. P. (1976). Amount and loci of classroom answer copying, spaced seating, and alternate test forms. Journal of Educational Psychology68(6): 729-735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J. P. (1977). Cheating behavior, anticipated success-failure, confidence, and test importance. Journal of Educational Psychology69(1): 55-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J. P. (1978). Curvilinear relationships among anticipated success, cheating behavior, temptation to cheat, and perceived instrumentality of cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology70(5): 758-762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J. P. (1983). Alternate test forms as a means of reducing multiple choice answer copying in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology75(4): 572-575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, L. I, Berger, S. E., and Millham, J. (1970). Individual differences in cheating during a temptation period when confronting failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology15(1): 48-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. T. (1989). DTSAT. Software for the Meta-analytic Review of Research Literatures. Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on Moral Development. Vol. 1: The Philosophy of Moral Development. Cambridge, MA: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBeff, E. E., Clark, R. E., Haines, V. J., and Dieckhoff, G. M. (1990). Situational ethics and college student cheating. Sociological Inquiry60(2): 190-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefcourt, H. M. (1991). Locus of control. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, and L. S. Wrightsman (eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes(pp. 413-500). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W. (1994). Identifying potentially interesting variables and analysis opportunities. In H. Cooper and L. V. Hedges (eds.), Handbook of Research Synthesis(pp. 111-123). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maramark, S., and Maline. M. B. (1993). Academic Dishonesty Among College Students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 360 903).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe. D. L. (1992). The influence of situational ethics on cheating among college students. Sociological Inquiry62(3): 365-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., and Bowers, W. J. (1994). Academic dishonesty among males in college: A thirty year perspective. Journal of College Student Development35(1): 5-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., and Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education64(5): 522-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCollum, K. (1996, August 2). Web site where students share term papers has professors worried about plagiarism. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A28.

  • McKeachie, W. J. (1994). Teaching Tips: A Guidebook for the Beginning College Teacher, 9th ed. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffatt, M. (1990). Undergraduate cheating. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Anthropology, Rutgers University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334 921).

  • Moore, M. (1990). Cheating 101. New Brunswick, NJ: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, L. L., Conoley, J. C., and Impara, J. C. (Eds.) (1994). Tests in Print IV. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyser, M. (1992, January 6). A cheater's guide to high marks (and big $). Newsweek, p. 45.

  • Rost, D. H., and Wild, K. P. (1994). Cheating and achievem ent-avoidance at school: Components and assessment. British Journal of Educational Psychology64(1): 119-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, N. L., and McCabe, D. L. (1995). Communication strategies for addressing academic dishonesty. Journal of College Student Development36(6): 531-541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruback, R. B., and Innes, C. A. (1988). The relevance and irrelevance of psychological research: The example of prison crowding. American Psychologist43(9): 683-693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schab, F. (1991). Schooling without learning: Thirty years of cheating in high school. Adolescence26(104): 839-847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, M. (1991). Alienation and anomie. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, and L. S. Wrightsman (eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes(pp. 291-372). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R. (1996). Meta-analysis and the exploration of causal mediating processes: A primer of examples, methods, and issues. Psychological Methods1(1): 47-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., and Vagg, P. R. (Eds.) (1995). Test Anxiety: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment. Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R. A. (1979). The influence of self-awareness on human behavior. American Scientist67(2): 187-193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhoit, S. (1994). Helping students avoid plagiarism. College Teaching42(4): 161-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimny, S. T., Kaspar, M., and Heckman, K. (1995, April). Contexts of dishonest behavior in a college sample. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston.

  • Zimny, S. T., Redhead, T., and Heckman, K. (1996, March). Predictors of dishonest behaviors across domains. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitley, B.E. FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH CHEATING AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS: A Review. Research in Higher Education 39, 235–274 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018724900565

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018724900565

Keywords

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy