Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance evaluation of a decentralized wastewater treatment system in India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Decentralized Wastewater Treatment System (DEWATS) provides an economically feasible and efficient wastewater treatment solution especially in developing countries. It has an enormous potential for developing a sustainable environmental sanitation system. In this study, the treatment efficiency of eight DEWATS plants was evaluated in the state of Maharashtra, India, for their performance in terms of selected physico-chemical parameters of the wastewater. Although the efficiency of some of the plants was lower than that reported in literature, the effluent quality of all the plants was within the permissible discharge limits of the Central Pollution Control Board for all the parameters. Comprehensive assessment of Plant I was carried in terms of its technical and socio-economic aspects. Moreover, LCA tool has been utilized to evaluate the environmental impacts of the operation stage of DEWATS. The midpoint, CML 2001 (April 2015) methodology was adopted, in which 11 impact categories were considered. From the life cycle impact assessment and interpretation, the main impacts are identified as releases of COD, P-PO43−, and N-NH4+ to water bodies and disposal of sludge. Due to negligible energy consumption, the operation stage was found to be less damaging to the environment. It was concluded that DEWATS can be a good alternative for treating wastewater with negligible energy and chemical consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Amores MJ, Meneses M, Pasqualino J, Antón A, Castells F (2013) Environmental assessment of urban water cycle on Mediterranean conditions by LCA approach. J Clean Prod 43(1):84-92

  • Batstone DJ, Keller J, Angelidaki I, Kalyuzhnyi S, Pavlostathis SG, Rozzi A, Sanders W, Siegrist H, Vavilin V (2002) The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). Water Sci Technol 45(1):65–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Battilani A, Steiner M, Andersen M, Back SN, Lorenzen J, Schweitzer A, Dalsgaard A, Forslund A, Gola S, Klopmann W (2010) Decentralised water and wastewater treatment technologies to produce functional water for irrigation. Agric Water Manag 98(3):385–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremen Overseas Research and Development Association [BORDA] (2015) Demand-based technicalsolutions to reduce waterpollutionby small and mediumenterprises and settlementsin densely populated areas. https://www.borda.de/content/uploads/2015/08/Dewats_2010_Sept_web.pdf Accessed 20 April 2017

  • Bremen Overseas Research and Development Association [BORDA] (2017a) DEWATS implementationby BORDA. http://en.borda.de/content/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/DEWATS_Inventory_2017.pdf Accessed 25 April 2018

  • Bremen Overseas Research and Development Association [BORDA] (2017b) DEWATS implementationby BORDA. https://portal.mwater.co/#/maps/8ccbb9c9dbef4cebb3e029e48a9819ed?share=a729464249d54650a1785f17538e25ed Accessed 25 April 2018

  • Castillo A, Porro J, Garrido-Baserba M, Rosso D, Renzi D, Fatone F et al (2016) Validation of a decision support tool for wastewater treatment selection. J Environ Manag 184(1):409–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Central Pollution Control Board, Government of India (1986) General Standards for Discharge of Environmental Pollutants Part-A: Effluents, . https://cpcb.nic.in/GeneralStandards.pdf Accessed 2 November 2018

  • Central Pollution Control Board [CPCB] (2013) Performance evaluation of sewage treatment plants under NRCD. Ministry of Environment and Forest. https://cpcb.nic.in/openpdffile.php?id=UmVwb3J0RmlsZXMvMjlfMTQ1ODExMDk5Ml9OZXdJdGVtXzE5NV9TVFBfUkVQT1JULnBkZg Accessed 20 March 2018

  • Central Pollution Control Board [CPCB] (2016) CPCB bulletin, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India. Available at: https://cpcb.nic.in/. Accessed on 10 March 2018.

  • Centre for Science and Environment [CSE] (2011) Policy Paper on Septage Management in India. https://moud.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/SeptagePolicyPaper.pdf Accessed 22 June 2017

  • Chen S and Chen B (2013) Net energy production and emissions mitigation of domestic wastewater treatment system: A comparison of different biogas-sludge use alternatives. Bioresource Technol 144(1):296-303

  • Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD [Eds] (2005) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, USA

  • Consortium for DEWATS Dissemination Society [CDD] (2017) https://www.cddindia.org/dewats Accessed 4 May 2018

  • Corominas L, Foley J, Guest JS, Hospido A, Larsen HF, Morera S, Shaw A (2013) Life cycle assessment applied to wastewater treatment: state of the art. Water Res 47(15):5480–5492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen M (2010) Sustainability of a decentralized wastewater treatment system in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal - technical and social challenges. Dissertation, Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Available at: https://nmbu.brage.unit.no/nmbuxmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/189419/monaEllingsen.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed on 24 April 2018

  • Emmerson RHC, Morse GK, Lester JN, Edge DR (1995) The life-cycle analysis of small-scale sewage-treatment processes. Water Environ J 9(3):317–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang LL, Valverde-Pérez B, Damgaard A, Plósz BG, Rygaard M (2016) Life cycle assessment as development and decision support tool for wastewater resource recovery technology. Water Res 88:538–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JM, De Haas D, Hartley K, Lant P (2010) Comprehensive life cycle inventories of alternative wastewater treatment systems. Water Res 44(5):1654–1666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foxon KM, Pillay S, Lalbahadur T, Rodda N, Holder F, Buckley CA (2004) The anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) - an appropriate technology for on-site sanitation. Water SA 30(5):44–50

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Montoya M, Sengupta D, Nápoles-Rivera F, Ponce-Ortega JM, El-Halwagi MM (2016) Environmental and economic analysis for the optimal reuse of water in a residential complex. J Clean Prod 130(1):82-91

  • Garfi M, Flores L, Ferrer I (2017) Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment systems for small communities: activated sludge, constructed wetlands and high rate algal ponds. J Clean Prod 161(1):211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrido-Baserba M, Hospido A, Reif R, Molinos-Senante M, Comas J, Poch M (2014) Including the environmental criteria when selecting a wastewater treatment plant. Environ Model Softw 56(1):74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB, Huppes G, Heijungs R (2001) Developing an LCA guide for decision support. Environ Manag Health 12(3):301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Zamagni A, Masoni P, Buonamici R et al (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):90–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutterer B, Sasse L, Panzerbieter T, Reckerzügel T (2009) Decentralised Wastewater Treatment Systems (DEWATS) and sanitation in developing countries – a practical guide. https://www.sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/DEWATS_Guidebook_small.pdf Accessed on 1 May 2018

  • Hendriarianti E, Karnaningroem N (2016) Evaluation of communal wastewater treatment plant operating anaerobic baffled reactor and biofilter. Waste Technol 4(1):7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Padilla F, Margni M, Noyola A, Guereca-Hernandez L, Bulle C (2017) Assessing wastewater treatment in Latin America and the Caribbean: enhancing life cycle assessment interpretation by regionalization and impact assessment sensibility. J Clean Prod 142:2140–2153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hospido A, Sanchez I, Rodriguez-Garcia G, Iglesias A, Buntner D, Reif R et al (2012) Are all membrane reactors equal from an environmental point of view? Desalination 285(1):263–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Indiastat (2016). State-wise quantum sewage generation and treatment capacity of urban population of India (As on 02.08.2016). Available at:https://www.indiastat.com/table/environmentandpollution/11/%201055%20waterpollution/294/967874/data.aspx Accessed on 8 October 2017

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006a) Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principle and framework. ISO14040:2006. International Organization for Standardisation, Geneva

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006b) Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044:2006. International organization for standardisation (ISO), Geneva

  • Ioannou-Ttofa L, Foteinis S, Chatzisymeon E, Fatta-Kassinos D (2016) The environmental footprint of a membrane bioreactor treatment process through life cycle analysis. Sci Total Environ 568(1):306–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidi S, Akbarzadeh A, Woo KS, Valipour A (2014) Wastewater treatment using integrated anaerobicbaffled reactor and Bio-rack wetland planted withPhragmites sp. and Typha sp. J Environ Health Sci Eng 12:131–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbar PP, Karmakar S and Asolekar SR (2012a) Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: A scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach. J Environ Manage 113(1): 158-169.

  • Kalbar PP, Karmakar S, Asolekar SR (2012b) Estimation of environmental footprint of municipal wastewater treatment in India: life cycle approach. In Proceedings of International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology (Vol. 30, pp. 30-34), IACSIT Press, Singapore.

  • Kalbar PP, Karmakar S, Asolekar SR (2013) Assessment of wastewater treatment technologies: life cycle approach. Water Environ J 27(2):261–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbar PP, Karmakar S, Asolekar SR (2014) Life cycle-based environmental assessment of municipal wastewater treatment plant in India. Int J Environ Waste Manag 14(1):84–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbar PP, Karmakar S, Asolekar SR (2016) Life cycle-based decision support tool for selection of wastewater treatment alternatives. J Clean Prod 117(1):64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamble SJ, Chakravarthy Y, Singh A, Chubilleau C, Starkl M, Bawa I (2017) A soil biotechnology system for wastewater treatment: technical, hygiene, environmental LCA and economic aspects. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:13315–13334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kermani M, Bina B, Movahedian H, Amin MM, Nikaein M (2008) Application of moving bed biofilm process for biological organics and nutrients removal from municipal wastewater. Am J Environ Sci 4(6):675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lassaux S, Renzoni R, Germain A (2007) Life cycle assessment of water from the pumping station to the wastewater treatment plant. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(2):118-126

  • Lorenzo-Toja Y, Vázquez-Rowe I, Amores MJ, Termes-Rifé M, Marin-Navarro D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2016) Benchmarking wastewater treatment plants under an ecoefficiency perspective. Sci Total Environ 566(1):468-479

  • Lutterbeck CA, Kist LT, Lopez DR, Zerwes FV, Machado ÊL (2017) Life cycle assessment of integrated wastewater treatment systems with constructed wetlands in rural areas. J Clean Prod 148(1):527–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Massoud MA, Tarhini A, Nasr JA (2009) Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries. J Environ Manag 90:652–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr FA, Doma HS (2009) Treatment of domestic wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor followed by a duckweed pond for agricultural purposes. Environmentalist 29:270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H, Turgeon S, Matte J (2010) The anaerobic baffled reactor - a study of the wastewater treatment process using the anaerobic baffled reactor. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b697/ea62a268121621a71c7363925d5c1c3dc5f9.pdf. Accessed 27 April 2018

  • Niero M, Pizzol M, Bruun HG, Thomsen M (2014) Comparative life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment in Denmark including sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. J Clean Prod 68(1):25-35

  • Pan T, Zhu XD, Ye YP (2011) Estimate of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from a vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland and conventional wastewater treatment plants: a case study in China. Ecol Eng 37(2):248–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasqualino JC, Meneses M, Abella M, Castells F (2009) LCA as a decision support tool for the environmental improvement of the operation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Environ Sci Technol 43(9):3300–3307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pasqualino JC, Meneses M, Castells F (2011) Life cycle assessment of urban wastewater reclamation and reuse alternatives. J Ind Ecol 15(1):49-63

  • Pennington DW, Potting J, Finnveden G, Lindeijer E, Jolliet O, Rydberg T, Rebitzer G (2004) Life cycle assessment Part 2: Current impact assessment practice. Environ Int 30(5):721-739

  • Piao W, Kim Y, Kim H, Kim M, Kim C (2016) Life cycle assessment and economic efficiency analysis of integrated management of wastewater treatment plants. J Clean Prod 113(1):325–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pietruschka B, Buckley CA, Campbell A (2015) DEWATS systems as a low cost solution for School Based Sanitation in Cambodia. Poster presented in IWA-Water and Development Congress & Exhibition, Jordan

  • Pillay S, Foxon KM, Buckley CA (2008) An anaerobic baffled reactor/membrane bioreactor (ABR/MBR)for on-site sanitation in low income areas. Desalination 231:91–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pintilie L, Torres CM, Teodosiu C, Castells F (2016) Urban wastewater reclamation for industrial reuse: an LCA case study. J Clean Prod 139(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla-Rivera A, Morgan-Sagastume JM, Noyola A, Güereca LP (2016) Addressing social aspects associated with wastewater treatment facilities. Environ Impact Assess Rev 57(1):101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghuvanshi S, Bhakar V, Sowmya C, Sangwan KS (2017) Waste water treatment plant life cycle assessment: treatment process to reuse of water. Procedia CIRP 61:761-766

  • Risch E, Loubet P, Núñez M, Roux P (2014) How environmentally significant is water consumption during wastewater treatment?:application of recent developments in LCA to WWT technologies used at 3 contrasted geographical locations. Water Res 57(1):20–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers M, Zhan XM, Gallagher B (2003) A pilot plant study using vertically moving biofilm process to treat municipal wastewater. Bioresour Technol 89(2):139–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Garcia G, Molinos-Senante M, Hospido A, Hernandez-Sancho F, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2011) Environmental and economic profile of six typologies of wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 45(18):5997–6010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Garcia G, Frison N, Vázquez-Padín JR, Hospido A, Garrido JM, Fatone F, Feijoo G (2014) Life cycle assessment of nutrient removal technologies for the treatment of anaerobic digestion supernatant and its integration in a wastewater treatment plant. Sci Total Environ 490(1):871-879

  • Sakthivel SR, Seshadri A, Rahman MA, Chariar V (2012) Standardisation of design and maintenance of DEWATS plants in India. Paper presented in IWA Conference

  • Sasse L (1998) DEWATS – decentralised wastewater treatmentin developing countries. Bremen overseas research and development association (BORDA), Bremen

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Kamble SJ, Sawant M, Chakravarthy Y, Kazmi A, Aymerich E, Philip L (2017a) Technical, hygiene, economic, and life cycle assessment of full-scale moving bed biofilm reactors for wastewater treatment in India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:2552–2569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh NK, Singh RP, Kazmi AA (2017b) Environmental impact assessment of a package type IFAS reactor during construction and operational phases: a life cycle approach. Water Sci Technol 75(10):2246–2256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Haberl R, Moog O, Shrestha RR, Shrestha P, Shreshta R (2009) Performance of an anaerobic baffled reactor and hybrid constructed wetland treating high-strength wastewater in Nepal—a model for DEWATS. Ecol Eng 35:654–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Raju NJ, Sagar G (2011) Process design for decentralized sewage treatment system with total natural resource management. Int J Water Res Environ Eng Commun 3(11):233–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh NK and Kazmi AA (2017) Performance and Cost Analysis of Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Plants in Northern India: Case Study. J Water Res Plan Man 144(3):05017024

  • Singh A, Kamble SJ, Sawant M, Chakravarthy Y, Kazmi A, Aymerich E ...and Philip L (2018). Technical, hygiene, economic, and life cycle assessment of full-scale moving bed biofilm reactors for wastewater treatment in India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(3):2552-2569

  • Sönmez N, Tengnäs A, McGrath V (2012) Design of sustainable sanitation systems for IDPA corail camp in Haiti. J Environ Manag 94:61–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes JR and Horvath A (2010) Supply-chain environmental effects of wastewater utilities. Environ Res Lett 5(1):014015 (1-7)

  • Subramani A, Jacangelo JG (2015) Emerging desalination technologies for water treatment: a critical review. Water Res 75(1):164–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutar SA, Kulkarni GS (2016) Development of decentralized wastewater treatment system for kitchen wastewater. Int J Innov Res Creative Technol 2(2):51–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillman AM, Svingby M, Lundstrom H (1998) Life cycle assessment of municipal wastewater systems. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3(3):145–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environment Protection Agency [US EPA] (2015) https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/mou-intro-paper-081712-pdf-adobe-acrobat-pro.pdf Accessed 14 January 2018

  • Water and Sanitation Program (2013) Water and sanitation program end of year report, Fiscal Year 2013. https://wsp.org/sites/wsp.org/files/publications/WSP-End-Year-Report-FY13.pdf Accessed 15 December 2017

  • Water Information Network South Africa [WIN-SA] (2014) DEWATS process for decentralized wastewater treatment. Technical lessons from Ethekwini municipality. https://www.susana.org/_resources/documents/default/2-2039-dewats-processfor-decentralised-wastewater-treatmentlessonv9.pdf Accessed 27 April 2018

  • Yıldırım M, Topkaya B (2012) Assessing environmental impacts of wastewater treatment alternatives for small-scale communities. CLEAN-Soil, Air, Water 40(2):171–178

  • Yoshida H, Christensen TH, Scheutz C (2013) Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge management: a review. Waste Manag Res 31(11):1083–1101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao C, Zhang Y, Liang K, Li J (2015) Environmental impact analysis of wastewater treatment process based on life cycle assessment. In International Conference on Education,Management and Computing Technology (Vol. 16, pp. 1614-1617), Atlantis Press

Download references

Acknowledgments

With funding from The Government of India [Department of Science and Technology, File DST/IMRCD/SARASWATI/2012/(G)/II] is gratefully acknowledged. The cooperation of the plant management teams extended during the study period is highly appreciated.

Funding

The research was conducted under the collaborative project “Supporting consolidation, replication and up-scaling of sustainable wastewater treatment and reuse technologies for India (SARASWATI)” and co-funding from the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme (grant agreement number 308672).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anju Singh.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Loubet

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 93 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 49 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, A., Sawant, M., Kamble, S.J. et al. Performance evaluation of a decentralized wastewater treatment system in India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 21172–21188 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05444-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05444-z

Keywords

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy