Abstract
Considered as plague in many cities, pigeons in urban areas live close to human activities and exploit this proximity to find food which is often directly delivered by people. In this study, we explored the capacity of feral pigeons to take advantage of this human-based food resource and discriminate between friendly and hostile people. Our study was conducted in an urban park. Pigeons were fed by two experimenters of approximately the same age and skin colour but wearing coats of different colours. During the training sessions, the two human feeders displayed different attitudes: one of the feeders was neutral and the second was hostile and chased away the pigeons. During the two test phases subsequent to the training phase, both feeders became neutral. Two experiments were conducted, one with one male and one female feeder and the second with two female feeders. In both experiments, the pigeons learned to quickly (six to nine sessions) discriminate between the feeders and maintained this discrimination during the test phases. The pigeons avoided the hostile feeder even when the two feeders exchanged their coats, suggesting that they used stable individual characteristics to differentiate between the experimenter feeders. Thus, pigeons are able to learn quickly from their interactions with human feeders and use this knowledge to maximize the profitability of the urban environment. This study provides the first experimental evidence in feral pigeons for this level of human discrimination.

References
Adachi I, Kuwahata H, Fujita K (2007) Dogs recall their owner’s face upon hearing the owner’s voice. Anim Cogn 10:17–21
Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267
Aust U, Huber L (2001) The role of item- and category-specific information in the discrimination of people versus non-people images by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 29:107–119
Aust U, Huber L (2003) Elemental versus configural perception in a people-present/people-absent discrimination task by pigeons. Learn Behav 31:213–224
Burger B (1984) Grebes nesting in gull colonies: protective associations and early warning. Am Nat 123:327–337
Cook RG (Ed) (2001) Avian visual cognition. Available via: www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/
Cook RG, Cavoto BR, Katz JS, Cavoto KK (1997) Pigeon perception and discrimination of rapidly changing texture stimuli. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 23:390–400
Dittrich WH, Lea SEG (2001) Motion discrimination and recognition. In: Cook RG (ed) Avian visual cognition. Available via: http://pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/dittrich/ default.htm
Dittrich L, Adam R, Ünver E, Güntürkün O (2010) Pigeons identify individual humans but show no sign of recognizing them in photographs. Behav Process 83:82–89
Gompertz T (1956) Some observation on the feral pigeon in London. Bird Study 4:2–13
Goodale E, Kotagama SW (2005) Alarm calling in Sri Lankan mixed species bird flocks. Auk 122:108–120
Halpin ZT (1991) Kin recognition cues of vertebrates. In: Hepper PG (ed) Kin recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 220–258
Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH (1964) Complex visual concept in the pigeon. Science 146:549–551
Huber L (2001) Visual categorization in pigeons. In: Cook RG (ed) Avian visual cognition. Available via: http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/huber/default.htm
Jerolmack C (2008) How pigeons became rats: the cultural-spatial logic of problem animals. Soc Probl 55:72–74
Johnston RF, Janiga M (1995) Feral pigeons. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Jokimaki J, Suhonen J (1998) Distribution and habitat selection of wintering birds in urban environments. Landsc Urban Plan 39:253–263
Levey DJ, Londono GA, Ungvari-Martin J, Hiersoux MR, Jankowski JE, Poulsen JR, Stracey CM, Robinson SK (2009) Urban mockingbirds quickly learn to identify individual humans. PNAS 106:8959–8962
Marzluff JM, Walls J, Cornell HN, Withey JC, Craig DP (2010) Lasting recognition of threatening people by wild American crows. Anim Behav 79:699–707
McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1983) Generalised linear modelling. Chapman & Hall, London
Miklósi Á, Soproni K (2006) A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn 9:81–93
Sliwa J, Duhamel JR, Pascalis O, Wirth S (2011) Spontaneous voice–face identity matching by rhesus monkeys for familiar conspecifics and humans. PNAS 108:1735–1740
Sol D, Senar JC (1995) Urban pigeon population: stability, home range, and the effect of removing individuals. Can J Zool 73:1154–1160
Sol D, Santos DM, Garcia J, Cuadrado M (1998) Competition for food in urban pigeons: the cost of being juvenile. Cooper Ornithol Soc 100:298–304
Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Belknap Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgments
A.B. was supported by the French Ministry of National Education. We thank Dr J. Rigoulet, who allowed us free access to the Ménagerie, and the students who helped us to carry out this experiment: Betty Hebert, Justine Philippon, Marie Mercier, Hanifa Challab. This study is part of a larger research program on urban pigeons supported by grants from the ANRJC (ANR-05-JCJC-0098-01), the Region Ile-de-France (no. 06-1064 MN 07) and the Seine-Saint-Denis department.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Belguermi, A., Bovet, D., Pascal, A. et al. Pigeons discriminate between human feeders. Anim Cogn 14, 909–914 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0420-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0420-7