eudaemonism

(redirected from eudaemonist)
Also found in: Thesaurus, Encyclopedia.

eu·dae·mon·ism

also eu·dai·mon·ism or eu·de·mon·ism  (yo͞o-dē′mə-nĭz′əm)
n.
A system of ethics that evaluates actions in terms of their capacity to produce happiness.

eu·dae′mo·nist n.
eu·dae′mon·is′tic, eu·dae′mon·is′ti·cal adj.
American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Copyright © 2016 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.

eudemonism, eudaemonism

Ethics. a moral system based upon the performance of right actions to achieve happiness. — eudemonist, eudaemonist, n.
See also: Happiness
the ethical doctrine that the basis of morality lies in the tendency of right actions to produce happiness, especially in a life governed by reason rather than pleasure. eudemonist, eudaemonist, n.
See also: Ethics
-Ologies & -Isms. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
In Hannis' hands the argument aims at a eudaemonist conception of the virtues in Chapter 6, supplementing traditional anti-consumerist virtues such as frugality, temperance and humility with Rosalind Hursthouse's notion of 'right orientation to nature', whilst autonomy itself is further recast in ecological virtue terms as relying upon 'proper understanding of the complex dependencies and interdependencies involved in human life and agency' (p.
It is also captured by the term "eudaemonist ethics.") Accordingly, as living beings we need a guide to conduct, principles to be used when we cannot assess the merits of each action from the start.
To illustrate the first possibility a longer example is required such as the following: to feel squeamish about foreign food, arguably, deprives you from a more eudaemonist lifestyle that would enrich your everyday experience.
West labors mightily to reconstruct Locke into an Aristotelian eudaemonist, and Mossoff follows suit--each of them surpassing Nathan Tarcov's plea (in a 1983 article) for recalling the "non-Lockean" elements in Locke.