User talk:The Madras

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, The Madras, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 19:11, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

rhodes

Yes, that's better. Thank you. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:45, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I replied here. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Hi can you provide an edit summary when you alter articles so other users can follow what's happening. Thanks --Jim Sweeney (talk) 22:06, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Foyle.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Foyle.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:21, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:MaltaPM.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:MaltaPM.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket

Hello The Madras! I noticed that you contribute to cricket related articles. We are a "WikiProject" aiming to expand, improve and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. We would like to invite you to join us. If you would like to help but don't know what to do, please see our project page or inquire on our talk page. You may sign up for the project on our members list. Happy editing!

--Dweller (talk) 11:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DaveChiliPeppers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DaveChiliPeppers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:55, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion regarding change to Philippines Campaign (1944–1945)

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Philippines Campaign (1944–1945)#Emphasis on British. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:24, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful

This edit accidentally removed an image from an article. As a result, the image was almost speedy deleted (fair-use images are speedy deleted if they aren't included in any article). I've fixed it. --Dweller (talk) 11:05, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, The Madras. You have new messages at Talk:Muhammad Ali Jinnah.
Message added 17:52, 15 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

April 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Muhammad Ali Jinnah, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. lTopGunl (talk) 17:56, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DaveChiliPeppers.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DaveChiliPeppers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. We hope (talk) 12:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC) We hope (talk) 12:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Breakfast

Hello, The Madras. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:53, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

For your contribution at Chacha Cricket, keep up the great work! Faizan -Let's talk! 12:09, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1959 Tibetan uprising, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taiwanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Surrey CCC Captain

While Gareth Batty has been acting as captain in the absence of Graeme Smith through injury, I would argue that Smith was appointed the club captain for the season and that that still holds. There's been no official appointment of Batty as far as I know, though he's been doing it on an ad hoc basis. (To complicate things further, in the just finished match at Guildford, Batty was out injured and Solanki captained the side.) I agree that it's rather a grey area - perhaps a footnote would be appropriate? (You're right about Azhar Mahmood of course, though it still seems strange to see "England" against his name.) JH (talk page) 07:55, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Very unusually for an overseas player, Smith actually committed himself to a 3 year contract as player and (I think) as captain. So, regardless of whether one regards him as still the club captain during his absence through injury, he should definitely still be shown as a member of the squad. JH (talk page) 08:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that would be my preference. JH (talk page) 09:32, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Benteke update

Hi there, I'm quite confused why you keep reverting Christian Benteke's profile to only state his city of birth and not his country of birth, the information you deleted was more complete and was better in-line referenced. Why get rid of his country of birth and remove the in-line links? I just don't understand.

I'm not going to start an 'undo' war, I await your response. Mountaincirque (talk) 09:35, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your comment on my talk page, I see your point, but the article already noted 'then Zaire' in the opening sentence. The majority of people in the UK or europe will not know where Kinshasa is without qualification, it is currently in DRC. The other option would be to say 'born in Kinshasa, Zaire, now Democratic Republic of Congo rather than to other way around. Mountaincirque (talk) 10:57, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Didier Drogba

Your picture is 5 years old and doesn´t show him in a football kit. Just look at the profiles from Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo, Xavi and Cesc Fàbregas. chelsea-fan1 (talk) 20:45, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Drogbas face is clear to see. If you can´t see it buy some glasses! (talk) 21:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Result of your 3RR complaint

Please see the result of this report at WP:AN3#User:Chelsea-fan1 reported by User:The Madras (Result: Both warned), since it contains a warning for you. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandro Cao de Benós de Les y Pérez: Military service and allegiance

The infobox includes a section on military service, with his rank (Alférez), and his allegiance. This information is not mentioned anywhere in the body of the article, and it is not referenced to any source. Allegiance to North Korea is a clear fact, however, a few minutes ago you added he has allegiance to Spain. What basis is there to make that claim? Thanks. (talk) user:Al83tito 10:03, 22 July 2013

Thank you for your note on my talk page. Duly noted. I see that you did not enter the info, but improved it adding the flag images, which is a great improvement to do on any page. So thank you about that! I will wait to see other peoples' responses and see if it is necessary to delete. Thanks. (talk) user:Al83tito 11:30, 22 July 2013

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chelsy Davy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zimbabwean people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heston Blumenthal infobox

The infobox template page isn't very clear about this at all, but it looks like the schools mentioned in Ramsay's and Oliver's education fields are both technical, vocational colleges which they'd have gone onto after secondary school. Blumenthal's is just a grammar school - the previous infobox stat of "Education: self-taught" means, I assume, that he didn't take any formal further education as a chef. --McGeddon (talk) 09:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps. But if "Education:" means "Place where this person learned to cook:", it's misleading to suggest that he learnt it at grammar school - and the article even contradicts this idea by explicitly saying that he was "entirely self-taught". --McGeddon (talk) 10:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you worried that saying "Education: self-taught" in the infobox suggests that Blumenthal didn't go to school? Maybe it's worth raising a thread at Template_talk:Infobox_chef to get the template documentation (and/or the template itself) clarified. --McGeddon (talk) 11:07, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Diego da Silva Costa

Hi there TM, AL from Portugal here,

the intro to this footballer's page is to remain exactly how it is, introductions are to be kept simple (WP rule, not mine!). When (if) he makes debut for Spain, the intro will be changed to either "...is a Spanish footballer..." or simply "...is a footballer" (another WP rule, not mine).

I did not send messages to anyone else because all other IPs doing that are probably dynamic, and they would not read anything. You will definitely receive this.

Thank you, happy editing --AL (talk) 17:48, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see your doubt. I have never edited in Atlético Madrid's article, but if he has a Spanish flag there it's not entirely wrong as he has double nationality. If he had a Brazilian flag it would also be acceptable (and for me the most correct one, he IS Brazilian!), but in the CURRENT SQUAD section we go only with one flag per player, i suppose for spacing purposes.

In his own article he should be listed (for now) as Brazilian, as it is that national team he has so far represented. Thank god there was no WP decades ago, imagine the edit wars over Alfredo Di Stéfano for example - he played for THREE national teams :)

Cheers --AL (talk) 22:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i agree fully with you on the first part, we should change that flag in Atlético's article. --AL (talk) 22:40, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. i repeat, i have never edited in Atlético's page. About Costa, the same idea: he is not NATURALIZED, he has double nationality, but we are encouraged at WP to write simple intros, so it's wrong to say "...is a Brazilian-Spanish footballer...". We should write "Brazilian footballer" and, when he makes his debut for Spain (i hope not, national teams are beginning to look suspiciously equal to clubs!), "Spanish footballer", or simply "...is a footballer".

I really can't be any more concise in explaining WP's correct approach, can't be of "extra" help if this does not suffice mate. --AL (talk) 16:57, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 protests in Turkey

Hi. First of all, you shouldn't do an edit without giving a reason. Secondly, "Parties to the civil conflict" of this article has been set accordingto the Turkish Vikipedi article. This protest was not against all "Turkey", it was against the 61st government of Turkey. So pelase leave this article as it is. Gezginrocker (talk) 18:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for months this article was in a terrible situation. A massive amount of editing work has been done in recent months. So "if it has been there for months, then it must be true" is not a correct approach. Secondly, this is a civil conflict, not a civil war. Flags are common at civil war infoboxes, but not at civil conflict infoboxes. Gezginrocker (talk) 18:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- If you are only worried about the flag, then why are you also changing "61st government of Turkey" to "Turkey" instead of just adding the flag? Gezginrocker (talk) 18:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- - I really do not want to deal with you anymore, this is a waste of time. So I have started a topic at the article's talk section. Go there and share your thoughts on this issue. Until this issue is resolved, I will revert every edit you make. Gezginrocker (talk) 20:51, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Kim Il-sung

Hi The Madras. Would you mind explaining a bit more what you were doing with this edit? You said the pix were in the wrong place, but you just took them out, rather than moving them. I don't want to blindly revert you, i don't like to do that, but without a bit more explanation i might; are you planning to put them in the right place, to move them within the article, what? Thanks, Cheers, Lindsay^Hello 04:29, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Portugal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WWII infobox

As you have edited that page, you are welcome to participate in a discussion that is taking place at Template_talk:WW2InfoBox#Allies. Thank you. ^walk victor falk^talk 03:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox flag

Please undo your edit [1] which is counter MOS WP:INFOBOXFLAG. Thanks. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 23:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Param Mudgal (talk) 06:23, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Azhar Mahmood's nationality

According to Azhar Mahmood's own article he became a British citizen in 2011 and is now a fully-qualified English cricketer. And it's supported by a citation. So, though it seems counter-intuitive for someone Pakistani by birth and who played for Pakistan, I think the England flag is the right one to use. Accordingly I'm about to revert your edit to the Surrey CCC article. JH (talk page) 20:48, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd forgotten that we'd discussed it previously. But I think when I said "You're right about Azhar Mahmood of course, though it still seems strange to see "England" against his name" I was conceding that it was correct to list him as English. JH (talk page) 08:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That might be the best solution. I checked in this year's Playfair Cricket Annual and it has "NQ" against his name, meaning that (assuming they are right) he's not yet qualified to play for England. (Judging by our performance at Cardiff, even at the age of 39 he would have been a useful addition to the side!) JH (talk page) 18:45, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for finding that source on Saido Berahino. I moved it to the Early life section, where it already said how he speaks French. I added some more important information from that link: his GCSEs, his friendship with current Warwickshire cricketers, and his involvement in basketball and athletics. '''tAD''' (talk) 17:19, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gabriel Agbonlahor, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. He was last capped in 2009, not 2011. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation for removal of {{Wikinews}} from Zlatan's article

Please explain me why did you remove the template from Zlatan's article.
Agastya Chandrakant (talk) 07:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Karl Marx page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The Madras. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anne Keothavong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hackney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The Madras. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Carberry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbadian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bosnia and Herzegovina cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lamb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, The Madras. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Howard the Duck. Your recent edit(s) to the page Philippines national football team appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. When match was played on November 2019, he was playing with Gala Fairydean Rovers. Howard the Duck (talk) 12:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Will Jääskeläinen article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 16:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What sources are there? Giant Snowman 10:06, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt is not reliable, the other one looks fine. Giant Snowman 10:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cathedral of Saint Domnius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

We all have opinions about the quality of edits we see. They can be better expressed than calling other editors "dumb shits". Name calling is neither constructive nor collaborative. Please remember the five pillars especially the fourth, Wikipedia's editors should treat each other with respect and civility. Cabayi (talk) 10:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 20:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the 4th or 5th time, please use edit summaries - you're going through articles deleting material with no explanation

--Doug Weller talk 17:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiring about changes done to Soliman pasha al faransawi article

Hello could you please inform me as to why you made changes regarding Soliman pasha al faransawi's children even though it is clearly mentioned in his biography? Mostafa. Aym (talk) 10:35, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of source to Soliman pasha al faransawi article

Kindly note that I have added a source to back up information previously erased from Soliman pasha al faransawi's article Mostafa. Aym (talk) 11:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Pierre Boisson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]