- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 02:10, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Simon Allard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This autobiographical article was created in good faith, but the author has since realized he doesn't satisfy WP:ACADEMIC or WP:GNG. The original author indicated on my talk page that he agrees it should be deleted. PROD removed by IP user. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 23:00, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Decent citation counts, especially for a community college professor, but not really enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1, and I don't see any evidence of passing the other criteria. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:34, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.