User talk:FDRMRZUSA

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User:FDRMRZUSA)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, FDRMRZUSA!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:10, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Battle of Nashville (December 15, 1864).gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:FDR OFFICIAL 1944 CAMPAIGN PORTRAIT (LEON PERSKIE) COLORIZED.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 07:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:FDR OFFICIAL 1944 CAMPAIGN PORTRAIT (LEON PERSKIE) COLORIZED.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 11:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dewey-defeats-Truman-1948.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RP88 (talk) 02:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:FDR OFFICIAL 1944 CAMPAIGN PORTRAIT (LEON PERSKIE) COLORIZED CROPPED.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:FDR 1944 Leon Perskie CROPPED.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maps from Meyers Lexicon

[edit]

Hi FDRMRZUSA,

noticed you uploaded new versions of the following files recently:

Thank you for uploading. Unfortunately it seems that they are from a different source than the old versions, though the differences seem very few. The files with names like “Meyers b… s… jpg” belong to a project on German Wikisource, where they are used for proofreading. So we need exactly the right edition and year of publication. Therefore I would like you to upload those maps with a different name please. Best regards --Mapmarks (talk) 15:53, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FDRMRZUSA, thank you for your answer on my talk page. I just uploaded the files again and you find them here:
Greetings --Mapmarks (talk) 22:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:C o a Callisto III.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Saudi Arabia (Reverse).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JPD (talk) 03:38, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vertical Flag of Turkey.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Huntster (t @ c) 04:05, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ali Khamenei delivers Nowruz message 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:04, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 1989 (talk) 06:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not overwrite files

[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


I noticed that you uploaded a file using the same name as another file, which already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

--20:23, 6 June 2019‎ Stemmaro

File:Coat of arms of the Central African Republic.svg

[edit]

You're not actually increasing the "resolution". You're increasing the default display size (which is something different)... AnonMoos (talk) 10:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Something went wrong with the Soyombo symbol in your upload. Fry1989 eh? 18:43, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fry1989: Corrected error THANK YOU FRY!!! FDRMRZUSA, 21:53, 10 August 2019 (UTC+1)

coat of arms of People's republic of Bulgaria (1967-1971)

[edit]

Hi, I saw that you fixed the files with the coat of arms and the flag of the People's Republic of Bulgaria (1971-1990). Could you do the same with files with the coat of arms and the flag of the People's Republic of Bulgaria (1967-1971), please? Best Regards --Пакко (talk) 18:41, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Пакко: Done! Ciao FDRMRZUSA, 21:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC+1)
Thanks, but I meant something else. So I uploaded a new file based on the 1971 coat of arms file but with the details of the 1968 one. Ciao! --Пакко (talk) 21:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, it was fair to reply to me here, not to return my editorial. I am one of the founders of the Bulgarian Heraldic Society and have been a member of the Wikipedia project since 2005. I have been dealing with the issue of the Bulgarian coat of arms for 15 years. My changes are based on my research. Тhe your argument with which you return my editorial is subjective - this is not my personal experiment! My version is based on my research and the differences between the two coat of arms is that in the one from 1968 the lion is colored but the one from 1971 is plain. Regards...

Edit Summary

[edit]

When editing a page on Commons there is a small field labeled "Edit Summary" or "Summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the Edit Summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the Edit Summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's name in the Edit Summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:33, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat_of_arms_of_Uruguay.svg

[edit]

Hi, I saw that you fixed the svg in the coat of arms, and I appreciate that, but there's an error that has appeared in multiple files, since 1906 by law, the Sun in the coat of arms must have 13 rays. Here the official text of the law if you know spanish: "El sol que corona el óvalo se configurará con sus tres cuartas partes visibles, dibujándose el disco con una cara, debiéndose ver los ojos y la nariz solamente; de dicho disco saldrán 7 rayos en forma de punta de lanza; de entre éstos saldrán otros 6 rayos dibujados en forma tal que parezcan llamas de fuego; el disco y los rayos referidos se harán con oro bruñido o pulido.", another proof, this is a picture of the official Coat of Arms how it looks in the entrance of the House of Government in Montevideo: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Escudo_Nacional_en_la_fachada_de_la_Torre_Ejecutiva_-_panoramio.jpg . Thank for your time, I'd like to see this error finally fixed. Coquimbo58 (talk) 03:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of line feed characters

[edit]

Please stop systematically removing all line feed and tab characters from every SVG file that you touch. If you want to reduce the size of a file there are almost always better ways to do it. Basic legibility of source code is more important than file size. MapGrid (talk) 02:44, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop up-scaling with Inkscape!

[edit]

Over the last year you have up-scaled the individual path coordinates in a large number of SVG flag files. You always leave the comment "Higher svg file resolution by "Inkscape" resizing". I assume this means you simply imported the files into Inkscape and uniformly scaled all path coordinates by some factor larger than one.

When you scale a coordinate value by a factor larger than one, you will usually end up with more digits than you had before. You have to decide whether or not to round the resulting coordinate values; or have to rely on Inkscape to decide for you.

If you round all coordinate values after scaling, then you are in effect creating a path that has a slightly different shape than the pre-scaled version. This means that the new scaled path is guaranteed to be less accurate than the original. That is not a good thing.

If you don't round the the coordinate values after scaling, then the shape of the path will stay the same but the file size will increase. More importantly, you are left in a state where the last digits of each coordinate value may be incorrect; this is especially true in cases where the original coordinate value was rounded from an irrational number. In such cases, the new scaled drawing will provide a false sense of accuracy that does not match its apparent resolution. This is not a good thing.

If you are going to increase the resolution of an SVG flag file that contains rounded irrational coordinate values, then please do the following:

  1. Read all official government flag specifications pertaining to the flag.
  2. Study any construction sheets that may exist on Wikimedia, government sites, or elsewhere.
  3. Calculate all coordinates using trigonometry using as many significant digits as your computer or calculator allows.
  4. Scale the numbers to match your coordinate system as appropriate.
  5. Round off all irrational numbers as a final step so your drawing is left with sufficient resolution.

If your only goal is to change the nominal dimensions of a file, then please simply add a viewBox and adjust the drawing's width and height properties accordingly. MapGrid (talk) 23:54, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Greece (1973-1974).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Constantine 18:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is a problem with this file. Read talk --190.80.230.54 02:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please help to make the Cambodian Ministry badge.

[edit]

Hello..! FDRMRZUSA Right now, a friend of mine who works in Cambodia has sent me a message that the Cambodian government has issued a svg ministry badge for ease of use in the civil service of Cambodia's ministries. before November 9th. Which is national day Have a badge to do(svg. File)

1.logo on Ministry of Interior. (Top priority) 
2.logo on Ministry of Commerce. (Top priority)
3.logo on Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts. (Top priority) 
4.logo on Ministry of Economy and Finance. (Top priority)
5.logo on Ministry of Environment. (Top priority) 
6.logo on Ministry of Mines and Energy Cambodia. (Top priority)
7.logo on Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications. (Top priority) 
8.logo on Ministry of Public Works and Transport. (Top priority) 
9.logo on Ministry of Tourism. (Top priority)
10.logo on Ministry of Cults and Religion. (Top priority) 
11.logo on Ministry of Social Affairs, Veterans and Youth Rehabilitation. (Top priority) 
12.logo on Ministry of Women's Affairs. (Top priority) 
13.logo on Ministry of Industry and Handicraft. (Top priority) 

Thank you for coming here.🙏🏻😍 --มองโกเลีย๔๔ (talk) 17:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reichsschild (1921-1933).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnar (💬) 07:52, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shape of anchors

[edit]

Please stop modifying the historical shapes of Spanish Navy anchors, introducing your own personal anchor design (en:Spanish Republican Navy#Rank flags and pennants, en:Spanish Republican Navy#Aeronáutica Naval fin flash). Xufanc (talk)

File:Flag of the Captain General of the Fleet Second Spanish Republic (1931-1939).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xufanc (talk) 23:18, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Minister of the Navy Second Spanish Republic (1931-1939).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xufanc (talk) 23:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spanish Republican Navy Naval Aviation fin flash (1931-1936).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xufanc (talk) 23:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Republic naval insignia

[edit]

I really don't know anything about the heraldry or insignia of the Spanish Republic (beyond the purple bar in the flag), and you already seem to have defenders. By the way, is the stretching in the latest version of File:Flag of the Captain General of the Fleet Second Spanish Republic (1931-1939).svg intentional? AnonMoos (talk) 01:24, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Haile Selassie standard

[edit]

@FDRMRZUSA: Hi, could you not edit the "necklace" on the .svg files of the standard of Haile Selassie you did to better match the sources?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ethiopian_imperial_standard_of_Haile_Selassie_I_(obverse).svg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ethiopian_imperial_standard_of_Haile_Selassie_I_(reverse).svg
The current "knots" and sea-shells do not match how it looks in any of the sources. In reality it was just a "segmented" ring with a star of david in each segment, with an Ethiopian crown at the bottom (at least on the obverse side?).
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/fd/b6/1c/fdb61c60ef1136e40c8af5e89a1db047.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DrA5dbpW4AEJLfg.jpg
There also doesn't appear to be a chain holding the bottom star, the text was yellow and not black, and the "necklace" + symbol should be far larger (the lion should be the same size as on the national flag).
I am not super good at .svg editing, but since you could create these new flags, do you think you could adjust these details? The correct necklace is not a very advanced shape/design, just a ring with the pre-existing star inside several times. --Havsjö (talk) 14:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Havsjö: Ciao, I am also not a very advanced svg designer (as Sodacan), however I tried to satisfy your requests, improving the current versions: now the Ethiopian imperial standards (perhaps) are better (more similar to sourced images) than the previous versions: please, can you verify? Ciao, FDRMRZUSA, 18:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC+1)
Thanks, FDRMRZUSA! But I still think some things could be improved to better match the sources. @Sodacan: Could you perhaps assist us noobs and preform these adjustments to the circle/necklace? :) --Havsjö (talk) 12:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Here is another clear picture (although ahistorical, it has english text, for example... But the design is the same and clear.
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-f56ca8ea91d3bdc2a01e891b5a22838b
And it does indeed seem the real reverse side has a crown at the bottom as well
https://www.greengoldgardens.com/sitebuilder/images/Imperial-Standard-of-Ethiopia-0002-327x192.jpg --Havsjö (talk) 12:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the text is also different on the reverse side!!
https://www.greengoldgardens.com/sitebuilder/images/Imperial-Standard-of-Ethiopia-0003-327x191.jpg
https://www.greengoldgardens.com/sitebuilder/images/Imperial-Standard-of-Ethiopia-0002-327x192.jpg --Havsjö (talk) 12:51, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Havsjö: Ciao, see the latest version (BY SODACAN!!!):

FDRMRZUSA, 18:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC+1)

File:Coat of Arms of Charles I of Anjou, King of Sicily and Naples (chivalric type).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 16:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Roundels standard?

[edit]

You refer to a "new roundels standard" - can you provide a link for your replacement to a weird (601x601) size?NiD.29 (talk) 22:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sobibór extermination camp map.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Nominated for deletion by Buidhe. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:10, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permission box

[edit]

The Permission box is where the Institution / owners is referenced.

The license is under its own header. See File:The Battle of Navarino 20 October 1827.jpg

There was nothing wrong with that example other than it was missing a USA license.

You need to go back and correct every instance where you have made these incorrect changes. - Broichmore (talk) 22:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Albania (1998-2002).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kj1595 (talk) 04:11, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another one

[edit]

Hi, could you please fulfill this request fixing the color? Thanks! Cheers, Achim (talk) 18:18, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 15:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Jordan (Please stop trying to fix things that are not broken)

[edit]

FDRMRZUSA, you recently modified the File:Flag of Jordan.svg because you said the star diameter was 85.769 pixels instead of 85.714 pixels. Let me first explain that I have a habit of using a large viewbox and then using integers because it keeps the file size small. In the Jordan Flag I picked viewbox of 10080 x 5040. The numbers are divisible by 2 and 3 which allows the triangle and the horizontal bars to be laid out with 100% accuracy. The star points on the star had a maximum error of 0.5 viewbox units. If you blew the flag up to the size of a soccer field, that would be a maximum error of 0.25 inches... that in my opinion is more than sufficient for any real world (or non real world) application. So I am claiming you made unnecessary changes when you tried to increase the accuracy. However, you also did some unnecessary damage while you thought you were improving things:

  • You made the black and green bars 10079.999 units wide instead of 10080 units. The error is admittedly small, but why not stick to 10080?
  • The placed the right point of the triangle at 5039.9995 units instead of 5040 units. Again the error is small, but why not stick to 5040?
  • You added unnecessary matrix and translation transformations to the star. The matrix transformation you applied does both scaling and translation, thus you are ultimately doing two one scaling operation and two translation operations on a single star. Why bother? It just adds bloat.
  • Ultimately you put the star in completely the wrong place. It looks like when you tried to follow the construction sheet, you bisected a side of the triangle instead of bisecting the opposite angle.

Also I think I may have asked before: please stop removing titles, tabs and line feeds. If you get in the habit of using tabs and line feeds you can catch a lot of errors and inconsistancies by looking at the file before it is uploaded. In this case you removed about 32 bytes of characters that I consider to be useful, but at the same time you almost doubled the size of the file with you transformations and use of floating point numbers. MapGrid (talk) 20:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Hello, I started a disscussion here (Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Flag_of_Morocco) and thought you may be interested. Cheers. --Flaspec (talk) 18:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your SVG optimization the code is indeed smaller, however there's a problem with the W3C validation (link) in this new version. Could you please check it out? --Flaspec (talk) 18:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note you can always upload file directly here [1] to check if the errors persist. --Flaspec (talk) 18:24, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Errors fixed, new version uploaded. --Flaspec (talk) 18:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Algeria.svg

[edit]

Hi, can you please stop reverting the file to the 977 bytes version? The current 311 bytes version is accurate and simplified enough. I can explain to you about the codes.

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="900" height="600">
<path fill="#fff" d="M0 0h900v600H0z"/>
<path fill="#063" d="M0 0h450v600H0z"/>
<path fill="#d21034" d="M579.903811 225a150 150 0 1 0 0 150 120 120 0 1 1 0-150M585.676275 300 450 255.916106 533.852549 371.329239v-142.658277L450 344.083894z"/>
</svg>

Based on the construction sheet, the crescent is composed of two circular arcs with radius 1/4 and 1/5 of the height of the flag respectively. (i.e. 150 and 120) the coordinates of the two tips of the crescent can be calculated as (450+150*cos 30°,300±150*sin 30°)≈(579.9038105676657970145584...,225) and (579.9038105676657970145584...,75). This explains the first part of the 4th line, the latter part is just the coordinate of the star.

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="900" height="600">
<path fill="#fff" d="M0 0H900V600H0z"/>
<path fill="#006633" d="M0 0H450V600H0z"/>
<path d="M 600.00003,300 A 150,150 0 0 1 450,450 150,150 0 0 1 300,300 150,150 0 0 1 450,150 150,150 0 0 1 600.00003,300 Z" fill="#d21034"/>
<g transform="translate(-491.50698,-17.03405)">
<path d="m 484.16602,764.16602 c -12.29929,0.0474 -24.51818,1.98543 -36.22852,5.74609 l -83.00044,114.2539 83.00044,114.36133 c 11.71605,3.72426 23.93481,5.62596 36.22852,5.63866 66.27416,0 119.99999,-53.72582 120,-119.99998 0,-66.27417 -53.72583,-120 -120,-120 z" transform="translate(493.56992,-567.13196)" fill="#fff"/>
<path d="m 941.50742,202.78015 a 120,120 0 0 0 -83.77144,114.25392 120,120 0 0 0 83.77144,114.36132 z" fill="#006633"/>
</g>
<path d="m -63.682584,72.936666 -11.663905,35.897794 30.536502,-22.186047 h -37.745194 l 30.536505,22.186047 z" transform="matrix(0,3.7795276,-3.7795276,0,861.34285,540.69008)" fill="#d21034"/>
</svg>

However this 977 bytes code contains too many unnecessary transformations and shapes. It can not be explained how those numbers with decimal places are come from. The 4th line is just a circle, why it need to be 4 arcs? Also why would there be cubic bezier curves in the 6th line? Therefore I don't prefer using this code. Thank you for your attention--Mike Rohsopht (talk) 04:43, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Presidential Standard of Uruguay (On Land).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Coquimbo58 (talk) 21:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong attribution

[edit]

Please see File talk:PORTRAIT OF FRANCESCO I DE MEDICI.PNG and File talk:Portrait of Francesco I de Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany (1541-1587).jpg.

Regards, Accurimbono (talk) 18:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Flag of the Royal Saudi Air Force (Seal).svg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of the Royal Saudi Air Force (Seal).svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 08:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Flag of Saudi Arabia (Reverse).svg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of Saudi Arabia (Reverse).svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 08:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Thank you for your work on cleaning up the SVG code for the Dominican Flag coat of arms, my good sir! Stupendous work! Keep up the great coding! Polancox (talk) 00:37, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - this file was perfect for some twelve years and was linked and accepted. The es:Wikiproyecto:Ilustración/Taller de Heráldica y Vexilología has the authority to change the file after a detailed discussion which you did not initiate. There is really no need to improve the code as it was valid before. So please refrain from useless code changes that have no productive benefit but only extended server and storage load. -- MaxxL - talk 11:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: Your version is according the W3C-Validator invalid and should be deleted. -- MaxxL - talk 11:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not precede the Attribs by * e.g.

|source=
* {{AttribSVG|File:FlorenceCoA.svg}}
* {{AttribSVG|File:Coat of arms of the House of Medici (Baroque period representation) - type 2.svg}}

- setting the * is nonsense! Write just (without *, SVG and File:) e.g.

|source=
{{Attrib|FlorenceCoA.svg}}
{{Attrib|Coat of arms of the House of Medici (Baroque period representation) - type 2.svg}}

or the improved (and now recommended) style

|source={{Attribs|FlorenceCoA.svg|Coat of arms of the House of Medici (Baroque period representation) - type 2.svg}}

Kind regards, -- sarang사랑 08:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not overwrite files

[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Raffael 039.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

You have been warned before. Please stop overwriting artworks. Multichill (talk) 11:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of RfC discussion at the Flag of Albania page

[edit]

There is currently a discussion at [[2]] regarding an issue with which you may be interested in --Havsjö (talk) 09:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Dylsss (talk) 04:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Italian coa

[edit]

Hello, I saw that you have created very well made coats of arms for some Italian princely families. for this reason I wanted to ask you if you could also have done it with the Lante and Lante della Rovere, which have coats of arms made long ago. like them there are other noble families that would need a coat of arms of the quality of those you make, so, if you can, try to see which ones you can create. thank you very much Giorgio Pallavicini (talk) 13:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Presidential Standard of Uruguay (At Sea).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Coquimbo58 (talk) 22:31, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Mexico (1934–1968).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ColorfulSmoke (talk) 06:50, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Can I ask you a favor? can you clean up the code of the panamian coat of arms? I uploaded today a new version and inkscape don't delete the unused code. Thank you. --Milenioscuro (talk) 01:18, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Milenioscuro: Done (further slight code cleanup and reduction, no other changes). Ciao, FDRMRZUSA 14:20, 3 July 2021 (UTC+2)
Forget it, I already did it. --Milenioscuro (talk) 02:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback!

[edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of the Anjou-Naples dynasty (Capetians) 2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

116.206.28.4 03:28, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:10, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dewey Defeats Truman (AN-95-187) resized.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Kavyansh.Singh.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 06:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Here -> File:Flag of the Duchy of Milan (1450).svg <- the eagle, not only the serpent should be crowned : File:2067 - Milano, Palazzo Trivulzio - Stemma sforzesco - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto - 20-May-2007.jpg. Can you add it please? Thanks! --Barlafus (talk) 13:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Afghanistan (1974–1978).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

74.98.226.71 01:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Afghanistan (1978–1980).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

― Tartan357 Talk 01:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Afghanistan (1987–1992).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

― Tartan357 Talk 01:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Saudi Arabia (type 2).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aziz bm (talk) 05:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saudi Flag

[edit]

Hi, I just wanted to inform you that your change on Saudi Flag type 2 has been reverted since the current one does not match “royal decree 1973” and it’s been voted by the admin LaundryPizza03 as an incorrect calligraphy after it was reported to Wikipedia Administration Noticeboard https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Help_desk#c-LaundryPizza03-2022-06-26T14%3A11%3A00.000Z-Flag_of_Saudi_Arabia

Please do not make any reversions Aziz bm (talk) 16:48, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flag and the COA of the Kingdom of Serbia

[edit]

Hi. The User:Savasampion keeps reverting the files File:Royal Coat of arms of Serbia (1882–1918).svg File:Flag of Serbia (1882–1918).svg without any source. He’s been warned multiple times not to do that without a source. I suggest you should ban the user so that he may not continue with the vandalism. Matabr060 (talk) 16:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop fooling aroung with our simbols

[edit]

Stop changing the symbols of the Dominican Republic. On this platform there are already DOMINICAN graphic designers who know their national symbols and their history. stop fooling around altering our symbols, starting with our national coat of arms. Risantana (talk) 23:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Central African Republic.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

94.140.246.27 06:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Grenada.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

94.140.246.27 06:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Mauritania.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

94.140.246.27 07:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Albania.svg

[edit]

Could you please upload a new version of File:Flag of Albania.svg based on an optimized version of File:Flag of Albania (eagle fixed).svg? (sorry I don't know how to provide a link to a file so you're just gonna have to copy and paste the URL) VexilAlpaca (talk) 23:24, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


File:Flag of Adal Sultanate.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wareno (talk) 21:36, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roundel of Cambodia (1976–1979).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LieutenantThanon (talk) 12:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Wow (talk) 01:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, hope this isn't a tall order but I wanted to ask if you could apply that fixed geometry stuff you did for the flag currently but applying it to one of the prior file uploads to match the actual historical version of the flag which had the swallowtail pennant.

I'd revert the files but then they'd be at an objectively lower quality to your fixes so I figured it'd be best if I could ask you if you could help here.

The files are:

I hope that this isn't too much of an ask but it'd do a fantastic job at sprucing up the pages on China :) NorthTension (talk) 19:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seal of the Iraqi Air Force.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buckshot06 (talk) 23:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:ENI.com - Logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yours sincerely, Grandmaster Huon (talk) 22:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Versalis S.p.A. - Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Appartei (talk) 09:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TIAFRIKEN TLV

[edit]

@FDRMRZUSAHaiti 201.229.162.115 03:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Pétain - Portrait photographique 1941.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The way of Changpian (talk) 07:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Taliban.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RepublicOfKorea1945 (talk) 02:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Immagini della Reggia di Monza

[edit]

Ciao, volevo chiederti un favore, se ti inoltro un link, potresti caricare le immagini che ci sono contenute? Sono tutto foto storiche che rientrano negli standard del template {{PD-Italy}. Fammi sapere e grazie in anticipo! Filorosse (talk) 18:45, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

your images of Amun-Ra

[edit]

Hi FDRMRZUSA. the images of Amun (post amarna) made by Jeff Dahl have all gold armband to keep them distinct for the skin which was added by A. Parrot however your images of Amun-Ra do not. I attempted to request an overwrite on them to fix it, however it was insisted that I ask you for your opinion first. PharaohCrab (talk) 13:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]