Content-Length: 308194 | pFad | https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18699

4B Dataflow Operators - use project and location from job in on_kill method. by lwyszomi · Pull Request #18699 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Dataflow Operators - use project and location from job in on_kill method. #18699

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2021

Conversation

lwyszomi
Copy link
Contributor

@lwyszomi lwyszomi commented Oct 4, 2021

Reason why we need this is because we can have situation where project_id is set to None but we define it in the dataflow_default_options. Job will start normally without error but in case when we decide to mark running task to different state we will get a error that the job does not exits.


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in UPDATING.md.

@lwyszomi lwyszomi requested a review from turbaszek as a code owner October 4, 2021 08:11
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:providers provider:google Google (including GCP) related issues labels Oct 4, 2021
@lwyszomi lwyszomi force-pushed the dataflow-cancel-job branch 2 times, most recently from ac5eb1c to f689911 Compare October 4, 2021 10:18
…hod.

Reason why we need this is because we can have situation where project_id is set to None but we define it in the dataflow_default_options. Job will start normally without error but in case when we decide to mark running task to different state we will get a error that the job does not exits.
@lwyszomi lwyszomi force-pushed the dataflow-cancel-job branch from f689911 to ee4fb37 Compare October 6, 2021 08:57
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot added the okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests label Oct 7, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 7, 2021

The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because it does not modify the core of Airflow. If the committers decide that the full tests matrix is needed, they will add the label 'full tests needed'. Then you should rebase to the latest main or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:providers okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests provider:google Google (including GCP) related issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants








ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18699

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy